GamingBolt

Dark Light
Gears of War 3 can be a huge success if…
-

Gears of War is undoubtedly one of best franchises this generation of gaming has bestowed upon us. In some ways Epic’s third person shooter has redefined standards in video games history. After two mega hits with Gears of War and Gears of War 2, Gears of War 3 is inevitable. Whether it gets released this generation is debatable, but there is going to be a third part for sure. We at GamingBolt put our thinking caps on and came up with a few new tips that can make Gears of War 3 a huge success.

Please Note: This article is not considering success in terms of sales, but the overall game play elements that could make Gears of War 3 more fun than its predecessors.  It might be possible that your favorite point may not be mentioned here but you can always mention it in the comments section below.

4 Player Co-Op Modes

Playing co-op with four of your friends should be amazing.

Playing co-op with four of your friends should be amazing.

An enhancement that we would love to have is the ability to have four players either in offline or online mode. Just imagine what a treat it could be where all of your friends are sitting together and just blasting through the locust in the single player campaign. It will be fun to take up roles of Baird, Dom and Cole.

Ability to play Locust in the horde mode:

We as playable in horde mode...muhahaha!

We are playable in Horde mode!...muhahaha!

Horde mode was one of the highlights of the multiplayer component of Gears of War 2. For starters, in Horde Mode you will essentially be joined by four of your friends and than one by one wave of locusts will attack you. It’s like a survival scenario where you guys have to stick together. Now you might ask “that is fun, so why do you want to have more?”  Indeed it was fun. But the question arises why we can’t play as Locusts where you get the chance to attack or maybe survive just like the COG forces.

Challenging bosses

Man this better not be easy.

Man- this better not be easy.

Every game has their set of bosses. But unfortunately, Gears of War and Gears of War 2 had a disappointing set of boss fights. I agree that there were a couple of good fights- especially in Gears of War 2 where you and your team infiltrate inside the huge rift worm which was pretty unique for me. But the spider locusts in the first one and the last battle with the Brumak in the sequel were extremely disappointing. Gears of War 3 needs to fix this.

Character development and an interesting plot

Gears of War 2 focussed on Dom's side of story.

Gears of War 2 focussed on Dom's side of the story.

One of the major issues that I see with Gears of War is sometimes the plot goes for a toss. The first one puzzled many fans of the game. Although the sequel took some steps by rectifying these issues by introducing some sort of a character development with Dom where he is looking for his missing wife, that too falls flat after some time. Gears of War 3 needs to have a strong plot and should primarily be focusing on Marcus Fenix and his story rather than concentrating on Dom which was the case with almost half of Gears of War 2.

The game should be bigger and more open ended

Its not open ended. Looks can deceive.

It's not open ended. Looks can deceive.

Without a shadow of a doubt Gears of War is a ton of fun. But I feel a bit odd that single player games are ending so quickly these days. Gears of War lasted six hours and Gears of War 2 lasted a mere eight. I mean, come on guys, I am paying $60 and in return I am getting just about 6-8 hours of game play. I agree that online modes do increase the life of a game. But there are tons of gamers out there who still play single player games only. Gears of War 3 should at least have a 12 hour campaign and this time it should not be linear. Small variations like multiple paths can make a huge difference to the overall experience.

Economic system

How about earning some cash by doing this?

How about earning some cash by doing this?

In the entire series you basically get your guns and ammunition when you kill some locust or you find it on the ground. Why not make it a bit more interesting? Let’s say you kill a locust and you earn some “Gears Cash” for it, you can use that to buy upgrades, armor and ammunition. These will be available through a vendor found in different locations in the game. Believe me if this is implemented the overall fun factor has only one way to go: UP.

Better squad related game play

You get the idea? This can be a lot of fun.

You get the idea? This can be a lot of fun.

There is so much potential here to have squad based gameplay but I am really surprised that it was not present in Gears of War 2. The only aspect which is present is at some points where you direct half of your team to a different path. What about including some elements from Rainbow Six or Ghost Recon franchises where you can direct your team to shoot at a particular group of locust or give out a “charge” order. It’s a minor thing but goes a long way in making a game more deep and enjoyable.

Multiplayer Improvements

Giving more perks to the player can go a long way in making MP better.

Giving more perks to the player can go a long way in making MP better.

The multiplayer of the series is good. But it doesn’t reach the level of greatness of multiplayer component of games like Modern Warfare. Give more customization options to the user like facial modeling, the gear you wear and- just about everything. The more immersion and interaction the player has, the more fun to be had.

More Gore

We want more!

We want more!

Well we always like to take down our enemies in a brutal way. Gears of War 2 did have some brutal moments where you can just slice through the locust using your chainsaw. Let’s take it a step ahead. The imaginations can be endless. Gears of War is certified for 18+, so target that market with appropriately mature content.

RPG Elements

RPG elements...this sounds interesting.

RPG elements...this sounds interesting.

This was reported by IGN UK back in July. Cliff Bleszinski suggested that the future of shooters lies in the direction set by games like BioShock and Deus Ex. So what does it mean for the franchise? I mean including RPG elements could just be a fantastic if implemented well. Does this mean that Gears of War 3 will also have side missions just like many of the role playing games do? If Epic does implement this element than it could be one major step for the franchise.

Nice to have:

  • More in-depth look in to the life of Adam Fenix.
  • Fighting alongside the Locust against the lambent Locust will be a blast. This could be possible since the Locusts are fighting for their existence against the lambent ones.
  • New weapons which will blast anything underground will be a cool new addition.

Tell us your take on Gears of War 3 in the comments section below.

mean common

50 Comments
  • John
    December 14, 2009
    Reply #1

    Okay so i am a big fan of the GOW series, both1&2 is well the best shooter experience by far i cant get the same intesity& rush like those games and here is a few things i wanted to add/ remove;

    -”Economic system” is a big No No , it just don´t suite the game..
    -The possibility to play it on ps3 would be kick ass ..( love the xbox360 but ps3 is just a little bit sharper on the grapics)
    - And there is somethin missing in gears2 that was in gears1 and that is when u run in gears1 the visual seemed a bit shakier & more dirty than gears 2 it would be nice if Epic brought that feeling back in to the 3rd game.

    - 4 player co op could be awesome

    -always thought that the blast effects of the grenades could be a bit bigger or dynamic.
    - And keep improving the weapon sounds. just check out operation flashpoint old game but the soundeffects used for the weapons is still unmatched in my opinion.

  • Stoner
    December 15, 2009
    Reply #2

    This game could be a success is they never make a 3rd one.
    The game play was long and boring. I played through both games and the story lines and everything just put me to sleep, I seriously mean I fell a sleep as I was playing it with friends.

    I’ll give them props for the graphics, but the rest of the game is pure shit.
    Even playing this game high didn’t make a difference. it still sucked.

    Oh yea, 360 for the Win!

  • JK
    December 15, 2009
    Reply #3

    SHOTGUN WITH CHAINSAW.. Maybe it sounds stupid but its funny to chainsaw someone with shotgun. NOOB POWER

  • Mr R4in
    December 15, 2009
    Reply #4

    What? I can’t believe no one has mentioned host advantage? First get rid of host and go with dedicated servers.
    No ghost cam . aka cheat mode

  • idylon
    December 15, 2009
    Reply #5

    The entire basis for this article is completely wrong. As @Muffin mentioned, this is NOT Resident Evil, or L4D, or even remotely COD. It’s Gears of War, which has prided itself in one on one combats, not endless killing of mobs with crowd control. People take pride in defeating other with head to head shotgun battles. It is the very essence of the game, especially online play.

    Therefore adding upgrades through a so-called “economic system” will RUIN the game. When you do this, the same way Modern Warfare does, you take all skill out of a game and it becomes more of who is willing/able to play more.

    On another note, its impossible to have 4 player multi co-op AND “better squad related gameplay.” Give current Gears users a choice and they will hands down pick playing through Campaign with their friends. So, agreed on that item, but not telling AI players what to do. Again, this game is about taking enemies out 1 at a time, mostly in an environment by yourself. That’s why the majority of campaign is always you vs. 50 locust.

    The problem with this article is that you are trying to turn Gears into Modern Warfare, which is probably the reason most people are still playing GOW2– they don’t like MW style gameplay.

  • Joeshmoe
    December 15, 2009
    Reply #6

    Gears of War 2 was a good game, yes it could be longer. but the changes you want to make doesn’t sound like you want another gears games, to me it sounds like you want a whole different game.
    The online was fun it put everyone with the same guns which was nice. the only thing i would change in gears is the damn matchmaking, it’s f**cking retarded the amount of lag you get and the advantage you have if your host is stupid.

  • Sam
    December 18, 2009
    Reply #7

    Honestly, the biggest thing they need to change in gears of war is the multiplayer.
    Getting rid of host and reducing the lag would bring back A LOT of people back to the gears community.
    I love this game but, quite frankly, the online multiplayer is disappointing ):

  • Waffle
    December 18, 2009
    Reply #8

    Economic system?? Yeah, ‘cuz that worked SO well in other games like Counter Strike: Source. Really??

  • fenix
    December 23, 2009
    Reply #9

    why would you want to tweak perfection? please no economic system!!!!!

  • WeapingDeath
    December 23, 2009
    Reply #10

    Why fuck with a formula that works? Gears I&II are a couple of my favorites and you’re trying to turn it into something it isn’t. If you want RPGs, then play an RPG. Want an economic system? Try playing a game that isn’t post-apocalyptic! Gears works because you pick up a gun and blast shit. It’s satisfying. I don’t want to think, “should I buy the longer chainsaw or upgrade the magizine.” I want to kill bad guys and get bloody in the process.

  • reece
    December 31, 2009
    Reply #11

    no rpg but if we could do a cog campaign and a locust campaign also make a lambent army dont put it on ps3 keep it on 360 and that will be the best game in history.

  • tommy lee jones
    January 9, 2010
    Reply #12

    ohh, they need to allow us to ride brumaks and reavers, thats the oly way it can get bigger and better and hey, how can we forget multiplayer fixes like
    fixing lag, better host selection, better matchmaking for international players, wtf, i’m in asia and cant even get a descent match……

  • Callum gill
    January 14, 2010
    Reply #13

    you should be able to mod the guns not to the extend of games like cod but just a little

  • Crusnik
    January 14, 2010
    Reply #14

    GOW3 should be on the PS3 360 and PC and have a way to link all 3 plateforms in one online MMO game play style of fighting were PS3 PC and 360 players can chate and talk to each other making it way better and more enjoyment out of GoW3.

  • Trudog72
    January 19, 2010
    Reply #15

    Biggest issue is the online play….could have been played as much as MW2 but the fact that the host is so over-powering,so rounds you may not even have a gun in hand, and and just terrible hosting has turned so many away….wish they would consider a migrating host like MW2 because i know they wont spend the money on dedicated servers

  • joe
    January 25, 2010
    Reply #16

    Do not make a economic system for gears the greatest part of gears is its simplistic gameplay to learn a gun quickly but take a long time to master i think more squad based games would be awesome i would recommend i think alot of cool maps and game types would do enough for me and if you throw in a few more new guns ill give you my 60 bucks again epic

Leave a Reply.
We are looking for News Editors. Interested candidates please contact us here



Login



Latest Comments Our Partners

Free Online Games
Not all online games are expensive. Click on the link for free games.

Latest Reviews Latest Previews Polls

Will you buy Heavy Rain?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...