7 Reasons Why All The Mass Effect 3 Hate Is Unjustified

Posted By | On 23rd, Mar. 2012 Under Editorials, Feature | Follow This Author @Shubhankar2508


Page 1 Page 2 Page 3

Mass Effect 3 has been getting a lot of hate lately, probably even more so than the likes of Call of Duty and Madden. Considering the history of those two franchises, this is a big deal. But why? ME3 clearly isn’t a bad game. It is’t a half-assed effort on BioWare’s part, and it’s one of the fullest games we’ve ever played. I mean, if a game has a Metascore of 93 and gets perfect scores from innumerable publications, including us, it obviously must be doing something right… right?

It is. It’s a wonderful game. It does have a few flaws, there’s no denying that, but from Ocarina of Time and Skyrim to Superman 64 and Big Rigs, every game has flaws. So what’s with all the hate then? Unlike a lot of people out there, I actually think the hate against Mass Effect 3 is very, very unfair, and most of it has no proper backing.

Here are seven reasons why I think the hate against ME3 is unjustified. This article will definitely get polarizing reactions, I know that, and I will be receiving a lot of hateful comments, but feedback is always appreciated. Remember, this is my personal opinion, and it doesn’t represent them opinion of all of GamingBolt.

Also, before you proceed, I’d like to point something out– I’ve played all three Mass Effect games, the first two thrice and the third one twice. I’ve read every comic book, I’ve read all the novels, heck, I’ve even played the iOS game. Right now, in fact, I’m on my first playthrough of Mass Effect: Infiltrator on the iPad. So I’m pretty deeply invested in the universe and the franchise.

So read the article, enjoy (if you will), and leave your feedback in the comments section below.

This article contains spoilers. You have been warned.

The ending actually isn’t all that bad

I get why so many people dislike the ending- there was no epilogue, no final boss battle against the terrifying Harbinger (or anyone, for that matter). I agree that it wasn’t the ending I expected- I expected better. But when I first finished Mass Effect 3, I was satisfied. The ending was fitting, in a way. Poignant. It certainly wasn’t as bad as everyone is making it out to be. To be honest, I’ve seen worse endings in a LOT of games- Killzone 2, Halo 2, God of War 3 and so many more. Why did Mass Effect 3 alone get all that hate? Because…

A lot of people are just going with the flow

Really, now?

Mass Effect belongs to BioWare. BioWare belongs to EA. That’s three names right over here that generate massive amounts of hate as it is. Combined together, they give you one entity that is probably as hated as Call of Duty, if not more. Mass Effect 3 has received a lot of hate. Why? It isn’t a yearly franchise, it’s not a cash cow, BioWare puts in time and effort into making these games and delivers on their promises. Why, then, are the players overreacting so much? Because most of them are just jumping onto the hate bandwagon. Just like Call of Duty and often Pokemon, it’s “cool to hate Mass Effect.” Most of the hate out there is hyperbolic trolling that is blowing the negative aspects of the game out of proportion and neglecting the positive ones completely.

Every game has technical issues

Not many people are complaining about this, but enough are. I’ve met so many people online who didn’t like Mass Effect 3 because it has glitches. Are you freaking kidding me? Every game has technical issues! Hell, last year’s GOTY, Skyrim had tons of technical issues. Most of the successful games- GTA, Elder Scrolls, Assassin’s Creed, FIFA, Call of Duty- have technical issues. In fact, most of the glitches and issues in Mass Effect 3 aren’t even game breaking. Many of them are even hilarious.

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3


Awesome Stuff that you might be interested in

  • Subass36

    I absolutely loved all the mass effects but I hated the last 5min of ME3, its the fact that the game draws players in so immensely that there is a lot more passion/rage when it comes to discussions. Making the decisions yourself in the game makes it personal, deciding who lives and who dies.

    *********spoilers*********
    However the uniqueness of each player is thrown away in the last 5min because all the endings of every player are basicly the same. All the mass relays blow up, you get the choice to pick a color of the explosions. It are decisions that shepard wouldn’t blindely accept without questioning.

    – Huge plotholes
    For example, where will the entire fleet go to now that there are no relays? They can’t go home and eventually they’le starve. And if a mass relays blows up their entire system blows up. And why is joker running away from the fight. Why did my squadmates on the ground magically appear on the ship. Why did the beam sent you right where you needed to be, I could go on and on and on.

    – The argument of the starchild:
    synthetics and organics can’t live alongside each other, the synthetics will kill their creators (the organics), I want to prevent this from happening by making synthetics(reapers) that every 50.000 years whipes out all intelligent organics. Turning them into synthetics to whipe out all the organics for the next cycle.

    – Finally:
    the ending that the game gives you seems much worse than the damage that the reapers would do. (entire fleet dies starvation, all relays destroyed thus all the systems they were in)

  • Bryton

    I agree that some hatred is unjustified, but there are many reasons why people would be, and probably should be, upset with ME3 ending. Mass Effect is an Epic. A franchise that’s been built over many years and a storyline with intricate detail. How do you sum up and Epic in 5 minutes? It’s not possible. ME3’s ending tried to do just that. This was the first issue.

    The 3 colored endings are relatively similar, which is fine, don’t care much about that, but the “epilogue” of the man and the kid, or Sheppard’s last breath? These things give unfinished endings to the ENDING of an Epic. A hero deserves his rest, let him have it.

    Yes there are more issues, but these were my two primary ones that I could justify.

  • charles2029

    The hate may be unjustified, but it keeps everyone talking about the game, so I guess it’s good for PR. It is good to see Bioware at least listening to fans.

  • Sabi

    So GB gets an IGN like look to it and now the contradicting articles? A Self Confessed BW fanboy defending BW?

    “Usually, I’m the first person to jump to BioWare’s defense, being the blind, unreasonable Mass Effect fanboy that I am” which is making the come off as a “Leave Brittany Alone” article.

    That said, I agree and disagree with this article.

    Yeah the endings weren’t that bad when compared to the endings of ME1 and ME2, my issue with the endings were how they were pretty much DE:HR endings just with no build up and they came completely out of left field. Like the Q had come to the mass effect universe.

    “it’s not a cash cow”
    Really? wasn’t this the same site that agreed with the backlash of a release DLC in an article written by the same person. Here:http://gamingbolt.com/opinion-piece-biowares-gone-too-far-with-mass-effect-3s-dlc Then there’s the upcoming DLC to fix the ending. Then there’s more merchandise tie ins to ME then some summer movies. REALLY? not a cash cow? REALLY?

    Every Game does have technical issues, but not every developer tries to justify a launch DLC by saying the game was finished 3 months prior to release so with nothing else to do they worked on the DLC only after release it’s seen that there was PLENTY they should have worked on. Nor do the games you mention come from a publisher that’s infamous for releasing unfinished buggy games to be fixed with DLCs

    I agree with the choices mattering yet I’m still not sure why there’s a council since not only did I let them die in ME1 but I disolved the council and let humans rule with Anderson in charge…as you should know that choice meant bubkiss.

    I also agree that the journey was great, so much better then Me2 although I found the Me2 cameos to be..well..just for the sake of saying “hey remember me!”.

    No one is saying MP is a cash in it’s more like it’s another “Single player game what suffered for a better MP experience.”

    Yes ME3 does answer a lot of question but if you didn’t buy the DLC, you didn’t get all these answers…not a cash cow you say?

  • Sabi

    I’d also like to point out something in THIS article..

    “I’ve played all three Mass Effect games, the first two thrice and the third one twice. I’ve read every comic book, I’ve read all the novels, heck, I’ve even played the iOS game. Right now, in fact, I’m on my first playthrough of Mass Effect: Infiltrator on the iPad.”

    “it’s not a cash cow”

    wait what?

    • Shubhankar Parijat

      Since 2007, only three Mass Effect games have been released in the canon series. 3 game in 6 years is a very good ratio. Especially when you compare it to franchises like Call of Duty and Assassin’s Creed.

  • Noye

    The fact that you overlooked was that Casey Hudson promised us a not A, B, or C ending. He gave us that… well more like he gave us an A1 A2 or A3 ending, in which I mean he gave us the same exact ending with 5% difference in each one. An ending where zero of your choices mattered from any of the other games… in fact it mostly relied on Effective Military Score…

  • Rev

    1-The ending is all bad, first we were promised several endings, we got one, choice was taken away from us, nothing we did throughout the entire series mattered, in the end the galaxy is doomed, your companions are doomed, and Shepard is dead (excluding the secret ending). It’s the same ending with different color filter.

    2- Do you have any statistics to prove your “bandwagon” claim? no, go over to the Bioware social network, everyone who voiced against the ending has a legitimate reason, and are by no means a minority.

    3- No one cares about technical issues present, they are eclipsed by the shit ending.

    4- It doesn’t matter all those little choices, have no bearing or impact on the ending, it’s all the same, if your going to take choice out of an RPG then might as well make it a rail shooter. Look at the epilogue in Dragon Age: Origins, while just a text wall in essence, but far more satisfying than what we got in ME3.

    5- I agree it’s a great game, all the way until you reach the end, what an arrow to knee that was.

    6- Couldn’t care less, I play Bioware games are for the story.

    7- If you’re satisfied with massive plot holes and star child at the end, then I envy you. Seriously what kind of logic is this, the catalyst creates synthetics to kill you every 50,000 years, so you don’t get killed by synthetics you made? I wonder how much time they spent on writing that, or how high they were?

    And let’s not forget all the unanswered questions, what happened to all the races? what happened to galactic civilization with the absence of the relay network? how did anyone survive the relays destruction if they cause a supernova? the answer: lots of speculation for everyone.

  • sonny112

    why for the love of god are people defending EA’s corprate greed ??


 

Copyright © 2009-2017 GamingBolt.com. All Rights Reserved.