Should Sony Be Trusted With The PlayStation VR?

Sony’s history of dropping support for their side projects and ventures may not indicate the best future for the PlayStation VR.

Posted By | On 17th, Apr. 2016 Under Article, Editorials | Follow This Author @Pramath1605

Later this year, Sony will launch the PlayStation VR. It is being billed as a pretty big deal- virtual reality is a burgeoning medium, and while Sony have been beaten to the punch by the Oculus Rift and the HTC Vive both, which launched earlier this year, they are also uniquely positioned to have the most (only) mass market high end VR solution out there- the HTC Vive is $799, and the Oculus Rift, $599, and both require high end PCs to run.

In contrast, the PlayStation VR is $399 for a base package, going up to $499 if you need the Move controllers and PlayStation Camera as well, and it can be paired with any PlayStation 4 console out there on the market- itself a pretty cheap machine to buy. The PlayStation VR, then, could be VR’s breakout moment, and if VR is to have a legitimate chance at mass market success, the PlayStation VR is it. Sony themselves have played up the importance of the PlayStation VR multiple times, likening the VR headset to a brand new platform launch, noting that they plan to support it as a second system.

On the whole, then, the PlayStation VR seems to be a Pretty Big Deal™, and it seems to have momentum on its side as it gets ready for mass market success. However, I find myself skeptical- skeptical about the PlayStation VR’s long term staying power, and of Sony’s larger commitment to the peripheral.

It is important to note that my skepticism is not based in the potential success (or speculated impending failure) of VR as a medium- whether or not virtual reality, which is being pushed pretty hard as the next big thing, and which is a legitimately exciting technology with the potential to offer some pretty exciting applications and developments, ends up being a fad or a paradigm shift is as of yet unknown, and an entirely separate discussion. I am not going to argue for or against VR’s long term feasibility here (for the record, I think VR is here to stay in the long term, albeit as a slow burn)- my skepticism for PlayStation VR is not skepticism for VR itself. VR will be fine. My skepticism for PSVR, rather, is based in a lack of confidence in Sony and their ability to support their product long term.

PlayStation VR


"Sony themselves have played up the importance of the PlayStation VR multiple times, likening the VR headset to a brand new platform launch, noting that they plan to support it as a second system."

It’s not an unfair concern to have, either. The history of Sony as a company, especially in the last decade and a half, is filled with failed ventures and products and initiatives abandoned just months after launch, after it became clear they weren’t going to be immediate successes. We could spend a lot of time going over everything on that list- but more pertinent to this conversation is the history of PlayStation, and their failed products and side ventures.

There, too, indications are hardly encouraging- the history of PlayStation is littered with the launches of failed peripherals and side ventures that saw a burst of initial support and enthusiasm from Sony, before being allowed to fall by the wayside, betraying the trust of millions of users who spent a good chunk of money on buying those products based on Sony’s assurances and promises. The most memorable, and most important from our perspective, are the PlayStation Move, and PlayStation Vita.

I can begin to hear the objections to this argument already- Sony is treating the PlayStation VR as their next major platform. There is no way they would let it wither on the vine, and just let it die out like they did with Move or Vita! And you’d be right… except you’re not. See, this was the exact sentiment that Sony expressed back when they first announced the PlayStation Move, too. ‘We’re approaching this like a virtual platform launch,’ Sony’s Peter Dille had said. Multiple companies and partners were announced, and Sony had hoped the Move would become the go to motion control platform for gamers. Sony swore support for the platform at multiple shows and conventions, including E3, promising Move support in most of their flagship products, and the Move was, in general, promised to fulfill the promise that the Wii had made to core gaming audiences.

And yet, all of this failed to materialize- the Move launched, and in spite of a marketing budget of $1 million (in itself a problem, and already indicative of Sony having second thoughts about the Move, which, they had promised,would be an all new ‘platform’ for them), it launched with a whimper. Game support for the Move never materialized, in spite of the fact that the peripheral was actually selling reasonably well. Sony promptly went on to lose interest in the PS Move, never supporting it with their products, and millions of Move controllers lay forgotten in households around the world, never actually used, a testament to Sony’s broken promise of their exciting new ‘platform.’


"This was the exact sentiment that Sony expressed back when they first announced the PlayStation Move, too."

The PS Move, however, is outdone by Sony’s biggest failure in recent times- the PS Vita is an even worse story- unlike the PlayStation VR or the PlayStation Move, it wasn’t like a platform launch… it was a platform launch. Sony was especially enthusiastic about the Vita, promising that it would become their flagship platform in Japan, and that they had learned from the mistakes of the PSP, hoping to have an even bigger success this time around.

Sony dropped $50 million on marketing during the Vita launch– something not evident at all when one considers that the Vita launched in a blaze of no glory, with no marketing, and that to this day, most people don’t even know that it exists. That wasn’t all, either- the Vita was supposed to lead Sony’s games strategy for three years. Sony promised that they would not drop support for it in favor of the console- “In the past we launched PSP and then shifted our attention to PS3 when that came on the horizon, which we now concede was a mistake. So with PS Vita we are working on this huge range titles and planning ahead for a constant supply of excellent games,” No less than Sony Worldwide Studios head Shuhei Yoshida had said.

This also turned out to be untrue- the PS Vita launched, and not only did it not lead Sony’s development (major games were still prioritized for the PS3 at the time), but as soon as the PS4 launched, Sony dropped the PS Vita like a hot potato, instead shifting all games to it. In 2014, Sony dropped major first party game support for the Vita, just two years after it had launched. In 2015, Sony officially labeled it a legacy platform– just three years after it had launched. And through all this, the 10 million people worldwide who had bought the PS Vita, an expensive $300 handheld, with even more expensive proprietary memory, on the promise of AAA gaming on the go, were left to a smattering of some localized Japanese games and a slew of ports of indie games from PS3 and PS4. That promised AAA game support never materialized. Less than three years later, Vita owners worldwide were left with a device that even Sony wasn’t supporting, with features for it being dropped rapidly, a device that may still see some use thanks to a slew of indie and low budget Japanese games, but that’s about it. A ‘major new platform launch’ had come to amount to absolutely nothing, except for a bunch of broken promises from Sony- again.


"Less than three years later, Vita owners worldwide were left with a device that even Sony wasn’t supporting."

My point here is, we have no reason to believe that the PlayStation VR will be any different- how do we know that Sony is not just using it as a jumping point for another cool technology, like they did with the Move, like they did with the Eyetoy, like they did with their 3D gaming ventures, and that they won’t forget about it so quickly? Sony is quick to call the PSVR a new platform launch- but they said the same for previous products, and they were only too willing to let them die.

You know how the success of a PlayStation product is decided, whether or not Sony calls it a ‘major platform?’ It is decided by the game support- I mean major in house first party game support. If Sony’s premier development teams support a new product, then Sony indeed views that product as a new platform on par with their flagship consoles. Basically, will Sony Santa Monica release a new game for this new product? Naughty Dog? The answer to these questions was ‘no’ for the PS Move, it was ‘no’ for the PS Vita, and so far, it appears to be ‘no’ for the PSVR, too. With Sony themselves unwilling to commit their best internal resources to the PSVR, it is clear that, no matter what they say, they do not view the VR headset as a major new platform launch, and that they will not support it like one, especially if things do go south, and it doesn’t do so well.

In which case- do you really have confidence that it will actually be supported by Sony? VR is a cool new frontier, and the sheer novelty is enough to sell people on these headsets- but would you actually be willing to drop $400 on a new ‘platform’ that Sony may drop support for just years later? Especially when not even a year ago, Sony dropped support for a $300 new platform just two years after it launched?

Personally, I would look at being careful with my money here- because for all we know, the PSVR turns out to be this generation’s Kinect. Not because I think VR will be gimmicky – I think it’s a long term gaming paradigm that is here to stay, whether detractors like it or not – but because I cannot say, sadly, that I have much faith in Sony’s ability to support any PlayStation product that is not their flagship console at the moment properly.

Note: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of, and should not be attributed to, GamingBolt as an organization.

Tagged With: , , , , , ,

Awesome Stuff that you might be interested in

  • Triton

    It’s going to die within a year.
    When regular consumers see the total pricetag on both PS VR and “PS4K”, they will probably choose Oculus instead.
    I would and so would all my friends I have talked to.
    I dont want the inferior hardware.

    • legacy

      Have fun they couldn’t even get the pre orders right

    • Triton

      Have fun with what?
      Im talking hypothetically about the worth of purchasing VR and what I would choose.
      Im not going to invest in any of that VR-shit, because the games are garbage regardless what brand of VR-set you choose.

    • AJ75

      Ehh, you don’t need PS4K for PSVR. Haters gonna hate. Hope you have a pretty sweet gaming rig already built or Oculus is going to cost you about $2K

    • Triton

      Not required, but still recommended if you dont want frame rate issues and throw up.
      Not believing ppl want the premium product is stupid.

  • Truth™ PSVR 960×1080®

    720P. Requires NSA Camera and waggle controls. Current PS4 can’t even run it properly. Dead on arrival.

    Vive may be expensive but it doesn’t spy on you and can run games at an acceptable resolution and framerate.

    • andy

      And you get to continue pirating all the games on it like you said you do with all PC games. No wonder the Vive is “expensive”, actually having to pay for something must be a blow to you.

    • Truth™ PSVR 960×1080®

      Poor sonycucks running to accusations of piracy because they can’t defend their 720P VR. I buy my games through Steam and GOG and can afford a Vive but I’d rather wait till Pascal and Polaris launch first.

      I’m not some poor sap begging mom to buy them a POS4 and defending their turd online like you. Better start racking up those good boy points to buy a 720PSVR 🙂

    • popo123

      This folks, is what delusion looks and sound like.

    • Truth™ PSVR 960×1080®

      Delusion is thinking the POS4 can run Fallout 4 in VR 🙂

    • legacy

      Do you actually have a life, or are you 9 years old?

    • Truth™ PSVR 960×1080®

      Do you have any sort of defence for your POS4?

    • popo123

      Delusion is bringing up something nobody here actually brought up.

  • silvas

    If it sells well, they will support or else they won’t. That is how things work in every company.

  • Triton
  • kee1haul

    They’ll drop this faster than a hot TV.

  • Mr Xrat

    Oh look, the Xgimps from Twitter have crawled out of their holes. Jamie Moron, go back to hilariously shilling for that four hour mediocre movie game you waited three long years for.

    • noel david

      is jamie moron here?

    • Truth™ PSVR 960×1080®

      Ruggarell your meltdowns and damage control over the PS4.5 have been hilarious.

      Time to pretend you aren’t a sonycuck for a while 🙂

  • jacksjus

    I placed a pre-order down but then this PS4k talk has me leery. To be honest I’d prefer the more powerful PS4.

    Btw for those comparing VR to 3D or any other past gimmick clearly hasn’t tried it out yet. Ignorance is bliss.

  • Xerocore

    Let’s face it…in the midst of this incredible smartphone games domination since the past 2-3 years, AAA games on Vita wouldn’t help much. Even Nintendo will find it tough in the handheld department in the future. Corporations will try all sorts of things and not all will work. You need to stop being so cynical and see what happens.

    • Sara Roudebush

      “my room mate Lori Is getting paid on the internet 98$/hr”…..!cs310ctwo days ago grey MacLaren P1 I bought after earning 18,512 was my previous month’s payout..just a little over.17k DoIIars Last month..3-5 hours job a day…with weekly’s realy the simplest. job I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months. ago. and now making over. hourly 87 DoIIars…Learn. More right Here !cs310n:➽:➽:➽➽➽➽ http://GlobalSuperJobsReportsEmploymentsLuxuryGetPayHourly$98…. .❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦::::::!cs310n….,.

  • andy

    No they should hand it over the Microsoft to do it properly, the guys focusing on 2002 Eyetoy AR tech at the moment.

  • Novacell

    LOL, of course they should it’s their product. Or maybe let Trump loose on it.

  • Of course they can!
    They are Based Sony. You hear me?! BASED Sony!

  • John Tambanillo

    One thing you didn’t mention, Pramath, was the “market” for each peripherals mentioned.

    The PSMove was too late in the market saturated by the shovelware of the Wii and people realised that. Even Kinect was the victim of it. Motion-control sucks! Ironically, VR in general would nothing without it, hence the “renewed” support of PSMove for PSVR.

    As for the PSVita, I’d have to agree though. They(Sony) shot themselves in the foot with this one. Unnecessarily expensive memory cards, dropped 1st party support, User-Interface (like borrowing the device to a friend) are all anti-consumer.

    Although, Pramath, even if your concerns are reasonable, you shouldn’t worry. VR is here to stay…

    • textomatic

      I’m not sure it’s here to stay. Its price level is not cheap. It requires you to play in solitude. There’s that issue with probable motion sickness. First gen equipment has a lot of wires. On the PS4 games don’t look too hot from a graphical stand point. Hardcore PS4 fans will buy it but will the casuals jump on board? Wii was a “party toy” that everyone could enjoy together. This thing is the complete opposite. Again, not so sure it will take off… maybe next gen at a cheaper price point.

    • John Tambanillo

      Too bad you feel that way and VR is not for everyone. You’re just seeing it as a gaming peripheral. You wouldn’t be wrong but you’re missing the potential usefulness of VR in general. Like cellphones back in the day, it will only improve in time and isn’t even a “party toy”.

  • Martin Steele

    i tried smartphone vr with google cardboard and a htc one m8, that was really cool, this can only be way better lol there are too many opinion pieces going round at the moment, like i’ve read a fair few times, it’s basically down to giving it a go to make your own opinion after trying it, i’m just diving in anyway.


Copyright © 2009-2017 All Rights Reserved.