<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 15 new inFamous 2 screens shows combat, explosions and impressive lightning effects	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gamingbolt.com/15-new-infamous-2-screens-shows-combat-explosions-and-impressive-lightning-effects/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gamingbolt.com/15-new-infamous-2-screens-shows-combat-explosions-and-impressive-lightning-effects</link>
	<description>Get a Bolt of Gaming Now!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 06:40:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: DirectingChaos		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/15-new-infamous-2-screens-shows-combat-explosions-and-impressive-lightning-effects#comment-61051</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DirectingChaos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 02:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=24115#comment-61051</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I find the next graphic style for this game quite perplexing, due to the timeline of the original it can&#039;t be a prequel but yet Cole looks a lot younger. I hope this has been done for a good reason and not just for the hell of it, after all the original was such a strong game I can&#039;t any justifiable reason for changing it for the sake of changing it. Obviously games need to change when making a follow up but it shouldn&#039;t extract or distract from the elements that made the previous game popular in the first place.  The perfect example would be Burnout, although Paradise was a pretty good game its wasn&#039;t the game I&#039;d fell in love with on the PS2 and regardless of how many times I played that incarnation I never felt about it the same as I did with previous burnout games.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find the next graphic style for this game quite perplexing, due to the timeline of the original it can&#8217;t be a prequel but yet Cole looks a lot younger. I hope this has been done for a good reason and not just for the hell of it, after all the original was such a strong game I can&#8217;t any justifiable reason for changing it for the sake of changing it. Obviously games need to change when making a follow up but it shouldn&#8217;t extract or distract from the elements that made the previous game popular in the first place.  The perfect example would be Burnout, although Paradise was a pretty good game its wasn&#8217;t the game I&#8217;d fell in love with on the PS2 and regardless of how many times I played that incarnation I never felt about it the same as I did with previous burnout games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rhinu		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/15-new-infamous-2-screens-shows-combat-explosions-and-impressive-lightning-effects#comment-60893</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rhinu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 11:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=24115#comment-60893</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Too many fantastic PS3 exclusives this year. Don&#039;t want to sound like a fan boy with Infamous 2, Littlebigplanet 2, Killzone 3, The Last Guardian, Journey, Ico/Shadow 3d collection, etc, etc this really is looking like the year of the Playstation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too many fantastic PS3 exclusives this year. Don&#8217;t want to sound like a fan boy with Infamous 2, Littlebigplanet 2, Killzone 3, The Last Guardian, Journey, Ico/Shadow 3d collection, etc, etc this really is looking like the year of the Playstation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
