<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 4K Gaming Benchmarks Revealed for AMD Radeon R9 Fury	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gamingbolt.com/4k-gaming-benchmarks-revealed-for-amd-radeon-r9-fury/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gamingbolt.com/4k-gaming-benchmarks-revealed-for-amd-radeon-r9-fury</link>
	<description>Get a Bolt of Gaming Now!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 07:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: bardock5151		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/4k-gaming-benchmarks-revealed-for-amd-radeon-r9-fury#comment-262310</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bardock5151]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 07:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=235500#comment-262310</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Anyone else notice that the titles that perform noticeably worse, are the titles where AMD would&#039;ve turned hairworks or another NVIDIA specific feature on for the NVIDIA benchmarking. Weirdly enough, the titles that AMD put it&#039;s boot print into like Battlefield 4, have very little gains.

Skewed results I&#039;d say. Turn on the known frame sucking hairworks or whatever and you&#039;ll logically field better results on the card that can&#039;t do it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone else notice that the titles that perform noticeably worse, are the titles where AMD would&#8217;ve turned hairworks or another NVIDIA specific feature on for the NVIDIA benchmarking. Weirdly enough, the titles that AMD put it&#8217;s boot print into like Battlefield 4, have very little gains.</p>
<p>Skewed results I&#8217;d say. Turn on the known frame sucking hairworks or whatever and you&#8217;ll logically field better results on the card that can&#8217;t do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DecimationPro		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/4k-gaming-benchmarks-revealed-for-amd-radeon-r9-fury#comment-262307</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DecimationPro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 06:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=235500#comment-262307</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I can buy 2x 9290&#039;s for 500 bucks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can buy 2x 9290&#8217;s for 500 bucks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DecimationPro		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/4k-gaming-benchmarks-revealed-for-amd-radeon-r9-fury#comment-262306</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DecimationPro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 06:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=235500#comment-262306</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So it is basically I highly upgraded R9290x, much like the 900 series is just a highly upgraded 700 series.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it is basically I highly upgraded R9290x, much like the 900 series is just a highly upgraded 700 series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
