Comments on: Amazing Xbox 360 tech demo looks stunning

By: doub7

doub7 — Tue, 22 Mar 2011 09:48:30 +0000

@shasty

Cuz they hate xbox…lol.

Wonder if any1 will use this? Seems like it would b useful for lighting if nuthin else.

By: shastyxmcnasty

shastyxmcnasty — Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:25:22 +0000

how can someone not be wowed by this…this is stunning..i would love to see this tech put behind a game like cod

By: ThatStupidGuy

ThatStupidGuy — Sat, 19 Mar 2011 16:49:11 +0000

It’s beautiful, but mostly because it’s glowing everywhere. Still nowhere near the very pretty games on both the PC and PS3.

By: jbg0623

jbg0623 — Sat, 19 Mar 2011 16:26:17 +0000

call me bias but I’m not impressed. Xbox has yet to wow me.

By: doub7

doub7 — Sat, 19 Mar 2011 05:25:32 +0000

This is sum pretty sweet tech. It is amazing how they r squeezing evry drop from the 360. That’s is y I am in no hurry 4 the next gen of consoles.

By: isarai

isarai — Fri, 18 Mar 2011 23:19:40 +0000

Um what exactly is so impressive about this, it’s just a small static area with nothing going on and some good parallax mapping. the actual polygon count isn’t isn’t that impressive given that they are counting the total ply count of the entire scene they got there. The lighting on thee other hand was pretty cool and i’d love to see that implemented in real time in more games, but still it’s nothing new

By: bman128

bman128 — Fri, 18 Mar 2011 19:17:29 +0000

Reminds me of the potential that the Xbox 360 has or my preference for well lighted shiny stuff.

By: miker17

miker17 — Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:00:48 +0000

Hehehe Directx 10 tech demo was more Amezing 2years ago

By: PilarVIRUS

PilarVIRUS — Fri, 18 Mar 2011 15:43:36 +0000

It’s amazing what Microsoft has accomplish on old technologies.

By: ehhhh

ehhhh — Fri, 18 Mar 2011 15:31:28 +0000

Eh. It just looks like a high res wii demo to me. Show me TRUE dynamic-realtime shadows on every object and realtime-realistic lighting from multiple sources and give those detailed geometry and not just rely on bump mapping (even tho you didn’t bother to use bump mapping here) and i would be impressed.