<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: AMD Might Jump Straight to A 14nm Process With Their Next Generation GPUs	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gamingbolt.com/amd-might-jump-straight-to-a-14nm-process-with-their-next-generation-gpus/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gamingbolt.com/amd-might-jump-straight-to-a-14nm-process-with-their-next-generation-gpus</link>
	<description>Get a Bolt of Gaming Now!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2015 20:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Psionicinversion		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/amd-might-jump-straight-to-a-14nm-process-with-their-next-generation-gpus#comment-256975</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Psionicinversion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2015 20:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=229968#comment-256975</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/amd-might-jump-straight-to-a-14nm-process-with-their-next-generation-gpus#comment-256970&quot;&gt;Marley Gibson&lt;/a&gt;.

Also you won&#039;t be seeing those gpu&#039;s (arctic islands) until about October 2016 anyway also the 14nm for mobile socs can&#039;t be used for gpu&#039;s. They are low powered process tech gpu&#039;s need high performance which takes longer to sort out]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/amd-might-jump-straight-to-a-14nm-process-with-their-next-generation-gpus#comment-256970">Marley Gibson</a>.</p>
<p>Also you won&#8217;t be seeing those gpu&#8217;s (arctic islands) until about October 2016 anyway also the 14nm for mobile socs can&#8217;t be used for gpu&#8217;s. They are low powered process tech gpu&#8217;s need high performance which takes longer to sort out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Psionicinversion		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/amd-might-jump-straight-to-a-14nm-process-with-their-next-generation-gpus#comment-256973</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Psionicinversion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2015 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=229968#comment-256973</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/amd-might-jump-straight-to-a-14nm-process-with-their-next-generation-gpus#comment-256970&quot;&gt;Marley Gibson&lt;/a&gt;.

Samsung and global foundries share node technology. So like with 16nm Samsung solved the yield problem and passed the solution onto global.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/amd-might-jump-straight-to-a-14nm-process-with-their-next-generation-gpus#comment-256970">Marley Gibson</a>.</p>
<p>Samsung and global foundries share node technology. So like with 16nm Samsung solved the yield problem and passed the solution onto global.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Marley Gibson		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/amd-might-jump-straight-to-a-14nm-process-with-their-next-generation-gpus#comment-256970</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marley Gibson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2015 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=229968#comment-256970</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/amd-might-jump-straight-to-a-14nm-process-with-their-next-generation-gpus#comment-256957&quot;&gt;Psionicinversion&lt;/a&gt;.

Doubt it. Samsung is the only one that works @14nm, and they work together quite a bit, and intel is being intel so AMD will NEVER use that.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/amd-might-jump-straight-to-a-14nm-process-with-their-next-generation-gpus#comment-256957">Psionicinversion</a>.</p>
<p>Doubt it. Samsung is the only one that works @14nm, and they work together quite a bit, and intel is being intel so AMD will NEVER use that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Psionicinversion		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/amd-might-jump-straight-to-a-14nm-process-with-their-next-generation-gpus#comment-256957</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Psionicinversion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2015 14:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=229968#comment-256957</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They will probably use global foundries for it ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They will probably use global foundries for it </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
