Comments on: Are Games Surpassing Real World Visuals? GTA 4 Liberty City Vs. New York City

By: jacky

jacky — Wed, 17 Aug 2011 06:05:32 +0000

In reply to jacky. gffrdheheh

By: jacky

jacky — Wed, 17 Aug 2011 06:04:55 +0000

you

By: Randy

Randy — Wed, 10 Aug 2011 23:35:48 +0000

im getting an hd video stream looking out my window but it has to buffer, i hate when real life buffers!!!!

By: what

what — Thu, 28 Jul 2011 02:41:54 +0000

about

By: Hm

Hm — Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:59:46 +0000

We’ve never even seen the real world – we’re all living in the Matrix. Do you think that’s air you’re breathing now? Hmm.

By: Regretless

Regretless — Mon, 25 Jul 2011 02:46:20 +0000

Virtual reality can never “surpass” reality – it can only catch up, or in some future case, completely mimic it. If “real” is the end game, you can’t really surpass it.

Why am I even here?…

By: Isolino

Isolino — Sun, 24 Jul 2011 20:13:06 +0000

Nothing like the real thing.

By: Energy

Energy — Sun, 24 Jul 2011 18:21:37 +0000

I have News for You: VIRTUAL IS PART OF THE REAL WORLD. . hA ! wut ? wut? :)))

By: Veebanjo

Veebanjo — Sun, 24 Jul 2011 17:15:10 +0000

what terrible choice of words, you can’t surpass real world visuals! if you surpass it then its no longer real world DUH

By: keltoş

keltoş — Sat, 23 Jul 2011 14:11:37 +0000

I think games surpassed real world visuals. Real world only uses directx10 but we are now at directx11.
Real world needs to upgrade its hardware, its getting old. If you compare, this generation of consoles have been on the market for 5 years but real world haven’t done an upgrade since big bang… and that was very long time ago.
I think we should show our disappointment in real world by spending more time on virtual worlds.