Comments on: Battlefield 3 versus Crysis 2: 1080P HD Screenshot Comparison

By: TheVGamer

TheVGamer — Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:07:52 +0000

The character’s hand on that screenshot lacks shadows because the sun was behind him= no shadows. Frostbite 2 engine is a superior one because they can pull off those amazing graphics, make destruction and they don’t need to bump it down so it can work on consoles.

By: Someone

Someone — Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:09:42 +0000

In reply to OnTheFence. It's not the developers fault , crytek wanted to make the best game-engine with the best graphics but a ps3 isn't strong enough to run the entire game-engine.

By: Wow

Wow — Fri, 29 Apr 2011 02:54:28 +0000

In reply to DiceMania.

Bf3 was/is made for the pc, and is effectively being scaled to ports, or “ported” TO consoles not FROM. Bf3 is made with the highest visual technology for pc’s. So, your wrong. Crysis was made with the then best visual technology. Bf3 beats crysis 1, 2, and (haha) “halo”. I’ll admit Halo looks pretty good, but comparing it to the likes of bf3 is plain silly. Halo is like a HIGH resolution picture of a LOW detail picture, of course it looks great for the detail of the picture. At that point your just comparing the ratio of resolution to detail, and even though it’s good in those terms doesn’t mean it actually is that good. I find call of duty is LOW resolution pictures of HIGH detail pictures. It makes it look great from a distance and with your eyes squinted to blur a little bit, but in reality it sucks. Bf3 is HIGH resolution pictures of HIGH detail pictures, and that my friend… Is true visual quality.

By: guest

guest — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:07:37 +0000

In reply to OnTheFence. the leading platform is pc, theyve stressed that a lot.

By: DiceMania

DiceMania — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 07:35:41 +0000

Look B3 Does Beat Crysis 2 In Comparison Crysis is alot like Halo with the more Fantasy/Animation Against B3 Realistic/Animation. But what do expect its SCI/FI but none the less you can Squabber and argue about Crysis 2 versus B3 Pc/Xbox/PS3 But In all Honesty Crysis 1 Kills Them Both In Ever Way B3 is like a Nitendo WII to Crysis 1 only because Crysis 1 was all made up pretty for the PC but when Crytex had to make Crysis 2 for XboxPS3 They had to downscale it to fit more Evenley. as Does Battlefield 3 because its all on Plateforms I would Love to See Battlefield just as a PC Game only and see how it competes agianst the Behemoth Crysis 1 so Till Then I would say battlefield 3 wins The Console War with Crytek, By The way i Personal Think Halo Reach looks Better Then Both Crysis 2 and battlefield 3 alot of fans misjudge Halo:Reach Graphics its actuall Perfectly Done with 100%anti alaysin with Smooth Polished Enviroments Characters Vehicals weponary And Halo Reach didnt even use all of the Xbox 360,s Power. not trying to start a Flame War just my Opinion.

By: IK

IK — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 04:47:58 +0000

Crysis 2 has a lot of cheap effects that make it look like it has better graphics than it does. I have it for PC (just finished it, actually). This is especially evident in still images. BF3 will destroy Crysis 2 in graphics when it finally comes out. And unlike Crysis 2 it won’t be a half-assed console port.

By: N1m

N1m — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 01:50:19 +0000

The BF3 SS is 720p. The YT vid is 720 scaled up. Nice try but inaccurate data comparison.

BC2 @ DX11 1600p 8xSSAA Max settings =

http://img861.imageshack.us/i/brownsugar1.jpg/

Crysis2 @ DX9 1600p Max settings

http://img707.imageshack.us/i/111je.jpg/

BC2 still takes the cake…. by a long shot………… Rashid stick to consoles

Gameel Gamal milosh misal

By: Joker21playr

Joker21playr — Wed, 27 Apr 2011 23:28:01 +0000

My thoughts… The ground comparison is a bad choice, you are comparing dirt with pavement. also the pavement looks like pavement and the dirt looks like poo with weird things in it (really?) I have a feeling BF3 dirt will look better. also the shadow on the weapons… no shadow on Crysis 2 arm(what the hell r u talking about?) and bad pics to compare again. BF3 pick has the sun and lighting on top of the character, not to the left of him? so if it had those shadows it wouldn’t make any sense!(watch the scene when they run through the alley with the dog and eat your words up. In case you are ignorant here, make sure to look at the GUN…)). The explosions seemed to be the only good comparison but idk what part the BF3 explosion is from but the crYsis one does look more attractive on that part. I bet it’s just because the sources of the explosion are different since you use different scenery of pics so yea, didnt like this comparison (no offence)

By: GissMan

GissMan — Wed, 27 Apr 2011 23:24:13 +0000

Crysis 2 looks good for now, but should look better with the DX11 patch. By the time BF3 is released it may have some direct competition with Crysis 2. We’ll just have to wait.

By: Wow

Wow — Wed, 27 Apr 2011 22:53:24 +0000

**Crysis IS one of them**