I got it for my XB1 cause all my friends play on XB1. And it looks great! Plays GREAT too!
You don’t have bionic eyes, or a pixel counting chip embedded in your brain. You wouldn’t know jack if Eurogamer didn’t tell you the thinks that are not so obvious. As far as the human brain is concerned, they look the same. Now back to gaming. 😀

lol over exposure equals realistic to you.. maybe I will crank up the contrast on my display to 400 to be more real.. ps4 version is a little better most dont care

it is a little better on ps4 like ghost most people don’t care about that your average person does not..

ps4 version is a little better just like ghost most people dont really care

no its a little better on ps4 like ghost most people don’t care about that your average person does not..

Yeah, I see what the fankids say. Seems to me, if you do not own a ps4, you know how it runs. Or the magical “I own both”. Kids will be kids I guess. Too bad reality makes those people look like idiots. But, I guess, when that is the only thing a fankid can fight with as far as comparing the toys, not only are they helping sell ps4s by looking so childish, they are also burying any reason to buy an Xbox one.
How about you brag about what you ACTUALLY do with the system instead having to run around and look like an idiot?(not you, the kids that actually think they can prove the Internet is better on one system over an other) makes me giggle thinking this is the new defense. “Our internet runs better than yours” kids will be kids.
Just an fyi to the fankids… Sometimes positivity leads to positivity. Defend(sell) your console about the cool features over making up stuff that every current gamer has known for 6 years to be false.

It’s been said many times before, but on multiplayer Xbox live has a much better track record. In turn, Xbox for multiplayer as well.

The only factor to take in to consideration is, what do your mates game on.

Digital Foundry consistently proves PS4 versions of multiplatform games run at higher resolutions, framerates, and better visual effects than Xbox.

Call of Duty Advanced Warfare SP Campaign

XB1: 1360 x 1080 when any action is going on, which is most of the time. 60fps most of the time, some very brief drops to 40s or low 50s. Adaptive V-Sync (screen tearing). Crushed blacks that can’t be disabled.

PS4: 1080p native, 58-60fps most of the time, some very brief drops to 40s or low 50s. Fully V-Synced (no screen tearing)

Call of Duty Advanced Warfare Multiplayer

XB1: 1360 x 1080 100% of the time, res scaling disabled, 60 FPS locked. Crushed blacks that can’t be disabled.

PS4: 1080p native, 60 FPS locked.

Summary, both offer a great experience. In motion, they look identical. Problems found on each are minute. If we were to only use our eyes to evaluate, we would conclude that this game is exactly the same on both consoles. How bout that?

“On record in our Xbox One video, we hit a lowest 56fps on the opening Instinct stage test – kicking in just as a shader effect disrupts the screen. Paired with that are a few torn frames, with the upper 33 per cent of the screen cut in each case. However, much like the Xbox One’s campaign mode we rarely see many drops below the 60fps line at all, and v-sync is almost always intact barring exceptional moments. A few odd, missed frames are caught while charging around Instinct, but for Detroit and Defender this simply isn’t a problem.”
The quote right before the one posted. You will also note that the issue of said fram rate has rather fine print that is actually tight in front of you… It is about the first level only. Their very own video posted of the highway scene has both consoles drop to 30+ for a button sequence! So it exist on both consoles.
There is give and take on both consoles. I’ll take a drop in frame rate over torn screens. (Why, to this day, I can play an assassins creed game) I also love how not one quote was used from the multiplayer part of the article, of which is the point I was making, where draw distance is effected on the Xbox one along with cairity and detail. If I must, I’ll grab that quote too but seeing it was before what you quoted, I’ll take it you read it and skipped it. In the videos posted, you will see that the average drop was 2 frames below the xbone with dips lower. But then the Xbox also dips, you are not really comparing anything tremendous. Just like saying 900p is not that big of a difference from 1080p but here, you are just saying the Xbox one hits 60fps more commonly, and I agree. Be it how many. According to which game on which console with whatever fanboy war you will find many who say it is not a big difference in any category, 5hrs later, the longevity of the game is the multiplayer and if that is to be compared, it is a constant difference with no dips.
The filter is to anyone. My point was that this filter is might be what is hampering the clarity since it is how it works in real life. A suggestion not a bash. And like you stated then must know, the image is the same as far as “the image” but Sony allows you to adjust your tv on how you like to view images where as reversing the filter is impossible. You can turn down the contrast or brightness but the crushed black will still be present and just look worse. once again, do not care but, there is a reason why all gamers say “that’s not how it looks on my tv” and they would be correct.
Love the console you want or have both, but this game has no winner on consoles. Better multiplayer on one, single player on the other. Two great consoles. But lies and goal post moving does nothing for nobody.