<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare Projected to Sell 40 Percent Less Than Ghosts	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-advanced-warfare-projected-to-sell-40-percent-less-than-ghosts/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-advanced-warfare-projected-to-sell-40-percent-less-than-ghosts</link>
	<description>Get a Bolt of Gaming Now!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 14:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jaedre		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-advanced-warfare-projected-to-sell-40-percent-less-than-ghosts#comment-243365</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jaedre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 14:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=212425#comment-243365</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[does this include digital preorders? because a lot of people have switched over to digital this gen.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does this include digital preorders? because a lot of people have switched over to digital this gen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MrSec84 .		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-advanced-warfare-projected-to-sell-40-percent-less-than-ghosts#comment-243349</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MrSec84 .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2014 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=212425#comment-243349</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think it depends on how good a COD this turns out to be. Activision were wise to back a new venture in Destiny, but they need to branch out and get their developers or new partners like Bungie to make something new. Don&#039;t milk each franchise for all it&#039;s worth. Update your tech sufficiently to show that you&#039;re in it to make a better experience and bring new things to gaming for the gamer.

I guess it wouldn&#039;t be so bad if they were milking a wide variety of games, while also actually pushing those titles forward, instead of sticking to the same stuff, all of the time.

We&#039;ll see what happens.
They were lucky to have as much financial success as they have done with COD, I mean an entire generation of ridiculous sales is better than most, especially on what was basically a yearly release and across virtually every worthwhile platform in the home.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it depends on how good a COD this turns out to be. Activision were wise to back a new venture in Destiny, but they need to branch out and get their developers or new partners like Bungie to make something new. Don&#8217;t milk each franchise for all it&#8217;s worth. Update your tech sufficiently to show that you&#8217;re in it to make a better experience and bring new things to gaming for the gamer.</p>
<p>I guess it wouldn&#8217;t be so bad if they were milking a wide variety of games, while also actually pushing those titles forward, instead of sticking to the same stuff, all of the time.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll see what happens.<br />
They were lucky to have as much financial success as they have done with COD, I mean an entire generation of ridiculous sales is better than most, especially on what was basically a yearly release and across virtually every worthwhile platform in the home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: HisDivineOrder		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-advanced-warfare-projected-to-sell-40-percent-less-than-ghosts#comment-243325</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HisDivineOrder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2014 12:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=212425#comment-243325</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It was inevitable.  Activision has never had a hit they didn&#039;t milk until it was dead.  Look at Guitar Hero or before that, Tony Hawk.  Kotick sees gaming like a cow that you milk until all it produces is blood.


Save some for later?  No way.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was inevitable.  Activision has never had a hit they didn&#8217;t milk until it was dead.  Look at Guitar Hero or before that, Tony Hawk.  Kotick sees gaming like a cow that you milk until all it produces is blood.</p>
<p>Save some for later?  No way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Psionicinversion		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-advanced-warfare-projected-to-sell-40-percent-less-than-ghosts#comment-243322</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Psionicinversion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2014 11:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=212425#comment-243322</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Think people are waiting for it be released first seeing as Ghosts was probably the worst COD of all time]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think people are waiting for it be released first seeing as Ghosts was probably the worst COD of all time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
