<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare &#8211; Zombies To Return?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-advanced-warfare-zombies-to-return/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-advanced-warfare-zombies-to-return</link>
	<description>Get a Bolt of Gaming Now!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: PS4 and XBOX1 guy		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-advanced-warfare-zombies-to-return#comment-239746</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PS4 and XBOX1 guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=205710#comment-239746</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I Hope they include it. I&#039;ve always wanted to experience zombies from a different COD developer to see how well they can build upon it or if they can do better.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Hope they include it. I&#8217;ve always wanted to experience zombies from a different COD developer to see how well they can build upon it or if they can do better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: elijah		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-advanced-warfare-zombies-to-return#comment-239744</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[elijah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2014 06:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=205710#comment-239744</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[agreed i think zombies should be left alone to treyarch, and i just feel like they have recreated black ops 2 in their own way, however; each company is known for something and thats been since before sledgehammer was in the picture, we&#039;ve known treyarch for zombies, attack dogs, and orbital vsats. we&#039;ve known infinity ward for the nuke and the pave low and or the ac130. they need to come up with their own style because they&#039;ve already ripped off majority of black ops 2. (not saying its a bad or good thing because i haven&#039;t played the game yet)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed i think zombies should be left alone to treyarch, and i just feel like they have recreated black ops 2 in their own way, however; each company is known for something and thats been since before sledgehammer was in the picture, we&#8217;ve known treyarch for zombies, attack dogs, and orbital vsats. we&#8217;ve known infinity ward for the nuke and the pave low and or the ac130. they need to come up with their own style because they&#8217;ve already ripped off majority of black ops 2. (not saying its a bad or good thing because i haven&#8217;t played the game yet)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-advanced-warfare-zombies-to-return#comment-239720</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2014 20:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=205710#comment-239720</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think they SledgeHammer should leave out Zombies.......what will TreyArch have to bring us next year if COD AW has zombies? Keep it fresh. Also that controller is sick. Just don&#039;t wanna pay $70 for it. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they SledgeHammer should leave out Zombies&#8230;&#8230;.what will TreyArch have to bring us next year if COD AW has zombies? Keep it fresh. Also that controller is sick. Just don&#8217;t wanna pay $70 for it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
