<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Call of Duty Infinite Warfare Won&#8217;t Use A New Engine, But Will Feature Improvements	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-infinite-warfare-wont-use-a-new-engine-but-will-feature-improvements/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-infinite-warfare-wont-use-a-new-engine-but-will-feature-improvements</link>
	<description>Get a Bolt of Gaming Now!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2016 15:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Andy Maas		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-infinite-warfare-wont-use-a-new-engine-but-will-feature-improvements#comment-293706</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Maas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2016 15:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=268028#comment-293706</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-infinite-warfare-wont-use-a-new-engine-but-will-feature-improvements#comment-293637&quot;&gt;Eddie Battikha&lt;/a&gt;.

I don&#039;t care how good the new cod game looks I&#039;m getting battlefield 1 

Sent from my iPad]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-infinite-warfare-wont-use-a-new-engine-but-will-feature-improvements#comment-293637">Eddie Battikha</a>.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care how good the new cod game looks I&#8217;m getting battlefield 1 </p>
<p>Sent from my iPad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Andy Maas		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-infinite-warfare-wont-use-a-new-engine-but-will-feature-improvements#comment-293638</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Maas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2016 00:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=268028#comment-293638</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-infinite-warfare-wont-use-a-new-engine-but-will-feature-improvements#comment-293637&quot;&gt;Eddie Battikha&lt;/a&gt;.

Call of duty is overrated

Sent from my iPad]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-infinite-warfare-wont-use-a-new-engine-but-will-feature-improvements#comment-293637">Eddie Battikha</a>.</p>
<p>Call of duty is overrated</p>
<p>Sent from my iPad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eddie Battikha		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-infinite-warfare-wont-use-a-new-engine-but-will-feature-improvements#comment-293637</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eddie Battikha]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2016 00:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=268028#comment-293637</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-infinite-warfare-wont-use-a-new-engine-but-will-feature-improvements#comment-292764&quot;&gt;Andy Maas&lt;/a&gt;.

But the story is gonna be good because a couple ex naughty dog developers are doing it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-infinite-warfare-wont-use-a-new-engine-but-will-feature-improvements#comment-292764">Andy Maas</a>.</p>
<p>But the story is gonna be good because a couple ex naughty dog developers are doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: KLEEBAN KLIBAN		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-infinite-warfare-wont-use-a-new-engine-but-will-feature-improvements#comment-292825</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KLEEBAN KLIBAN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 23:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=268028#comment-292825</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-infinite-warfare-wont-use-a-new-engine-but-will-feature-improvements#comment-292795&quot;&gt;DigitalDaniel&lt;/a&gt;.

I get that. I read a lot from people who didn&#039;t want CoD to evolve the way it has. Although you never really &quot;hear&quot; it when you game online, maybe now and then. I think the reality is that most people want more to their gaming . Generally people with complaints are the most vocal, so you see more people saying they don&#039;t want futuristic CoD on forums, but that&#039;s just because people who approve have nothing to complain about. Wall running and boost jumping/sliding makes the game more fast pace and, for most people, more fun. I actually thought AW was a great change, and miss the forward mid-air boost, but all around BO3 is better. At the end of the day it&#039;s business and siding with the majority makes more money, and these guys got family to support. Family is more important than long time fan preference. Hopefully they will make a past CoD again one of these days, so that those who want it can have it, but whichever developer does this will be the developer to lose out on cash, unless they can find a way to make the games fast paced. At least this year there will also be Battlefield 1 with WWI setting so if that theme is what is important to you, then I hear BF is a great game save some consistent launch problems. Also the Modern Warfare remake is interesting, but I guarantee you, there will be more people on the Infinite Warfare servers than Modern Warfare. At first there will be people interested to check it out, but eventually it will only be those who liked the older setting, and all the rest of the players will be on Infinite Warfare. Maybe Activision is even hoping this remaster will show a lot of people that, despite their nostalgia, they don&#039;t really want CoD to digress back to its roots.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-infinite-warfare-wont-use-a-new-engine-but-will-feature-improvements#comment-292795">DigitalDaniel</a>.</p>
<p>I get that. I read a lot from people who didn&#8217;t want CoD to evolve the way it has. Although you never really &#8220;hear&#8221; it when you game online, maybe now and then. I think the reality is that most people want more to their gaming . Generally people with complaints are the most vocal, so you see more people saying they don&#8217;t want futuristic CoD on forums, but that&#8217;s just because people who approve have nothing to complain about. Wall running and boost jumping/sliding makes the game more fast pace and, for most people, more fun. I actually thought AW was a great change, and miss the forward mid-air boost, but all around BO3 is better. At the end of the day it&#8217;s business and siding with the majority makes more money, and these guys got family to support. Family is more important than long time fan preference. Hopefully they will make a past CoD again one of these days, so that those who want it can have it, but whichever developer does this will be the developer to lose out on cash, unless they can find a way to make the games fast paced. At least this year there will also be Battlefield 1 with WWI setting so if that theme is what is important to you, then I hear BF is a great game save some consistent launch problems. Also the Modern Warfare remake is interesting, but I guarantee you, there will be more people on the Infinite Warfare servers than Modern Warfare. At first there will be people interested to check it out, but eventually it will only be those who liked the older setting, and all the rest of the players will be on Infinite Warfare. Maybe Activision is even hoping this remaster will show a lot of people that, despite their nostalgia, they don&#8217;t really want CoD to digress back to its roots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: cweb1988		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-infinite-warfare-wont-use-a-new-engine-but-will-feature-improvements#comment-292808</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cweb1988]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 16:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=268028#comment-292808</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I mean it&#039;s just a tool. But still....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean it&#8217;s just a tool. But still&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DiamondDogs1		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-infinite-warfare-wont-use-a-new-engine-but-will-feature-improvements#comment-292800</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DiamondDogs1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 14:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=268028#comment-292800</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-infinite-warfare-wont-use-a-new-engine-but-will-feature-improvements#comment-292760&quot;&gt;lagann&lt;/a&gt;.

yep while the entire consumer base sees a reason for it lmao :P]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-infinite-warfare-wont-use-a-new-engine-but-will-feature-improvements#comment-292760">lagann</a>.</p>
<p>yep while the entire consumer base sees a reason for it lmao 😛</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DigitalDaniel		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-infinite-warfare-wont-use-a-new-engine-but-will-feature-improvements#comment-292795</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DigitalDaniel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 12:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=268028#comment-292795</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My issue with CoD is not the engine. Engine works fine. Visually the game looks good while running at 60fps. It&#039;s the sci-fi nonsense that bugs me. I want something like World At War 2. A game where I don&#039;t have jetpacks, running on walls, robots killing for me etc. THIS killed CoD for me, not the engine.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My issue with CoD is not the engine. Engine works fine. Visually the game looks good while running at 60fps. It&#8217;s the sci-fi nonsense that bugs me. I want something like World At War 2. A game where I don&#8217;t have jetpacks, running on walls, robots killing for me etc. THIS killed CoD for me, not the engine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Riggybro		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-infinite-warfare-wont-use-a-new-engine-but-will-feature-improvements#comment-292779</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Riggybro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 07:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=268028#comment-292779</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;there are reasons for Infinity Ward to stick with it&quot; - because your readers keep buying it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;there are reasons for Infinity Ward to stick with it&#8221; &#8211; because your readers keep buying it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Andy Maas		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-infinite-warfare-wont-use-a-new-engine-but-will-feature-improvements#comment-292764</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Maas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2016 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=268028#comment-292764</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m getting the new battlefield cod is overrated ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m getting the new battlefield cod is overrated </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: lagann		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-infinite-warfare-wont-use-a-new-engine-but-will-feature-improvements#comment-292760</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lagann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2016 21:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=268028#comment-292760</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The game engine is there to make possible what game devs want. If the engine, with its updates, is still capable of doing what they want...i see no reason why they would change engines. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The game engine is there to make possible what game devs want. If the engine, with its updates, is still capable of doing what they want&#8230;i see no reason why they would change engines. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
