Comments on: Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 Review

By: mod

mod — Wed, 01 Aug 2012 21:06:00 +0000

am sorry are you on crack

By: Shubhankar Parijat

Shubhankar Parijat — Wed, 30 Nov 2011 14:46:41 +0000

In reply to korda. Just because your opinion differs from that of mine does not mean I have "no critical value whatsoever". It means that your opinion is different than mine- that's it. You're free to voice your opinions, but there's no need to force them on others, you know.

By: korda

korda — Fri, 25 Nov 2011 20:25:02 +0000

wow i can't believe you have given such a high score for such a mediocre game... campaign is not going to ''keep you on the edge of you seat'' when you already know what a hell is going to happen... you have no f*cking gaming experience whatsoever, all you do is point to someone's head and click. and repeat that for several hundred times. occasionally you even move! heyy incredible gameplay! cod4 was much better in that regard. graphics are outdated by 3 years so even the scripted ''spectatcular'' scenes look like sh*t. this game is just an expansion of mw2 and it is shameful it costs 60$. the fact you gave it 10 just proves the point that this website is sh*t and no one cares about your reviews or opinions. you have no critical value whatsoever.

By: Shubhankar Parijat

Shubhankar Parijat — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 20:41:20 +0000

In reply to ghostkill221.

Your arguments are all well backed, but there’s just one thing- as perfect score does not mean the GAME itself is perfect. A game which achieved a 10/10 is not a perfect game. NO game can be perfect, it’s impossible. Each and ever game, even if it’s a masterpiece in its own right, WILL have flaws and errors. A 10 represents the fun one gets out of a game. Modern Warfare 3 may not be perfect, it may gave flaws, but it’s so much fun and so well developed that it’s hard not to give it anything but a 10. As for your argument about this being the same game as MW1 was, I strongly disagree. Modern Warfare 3 has changed a lot of stuff- it’s added a ton of new modes, it’s radically changed several features in the MP component, it has a new campaign for God’s sake. It’s no different from any other sequel in the market. A series doesn’t have to innovate with each game, though I do think the time when CoD will have to do that is getting closer. But please, this is NOT the same game as MW1, or MW2, or any other CoD game. Stop using that argument, it’s a flaming piece of crap.

By: ghostkill221

ghostkill221 — Tue, 15 Nov 2011 02:19:28 +0000

Bull. TEN? really? I’m not some hardcore BF3 fan in fact i never even got around to buying BF after that horribly buggy beta. I played Modern Warfare 3 at the store for four hours prior to its release and have playing on my friends copy on occasion when Skyrim overwhelms me. I didn’t buy the game midnight release for the same reason I’m angered here. I ALREADY PAYED $60 for this game 3 times!

Do you remember the jump in innovation from Call of Duty 3 to Modern Warfare 1? That Groundbreaking game deserved a 10 absolutely. Now look at the jump between Call of Duty 4, and Modern Warfare 3, 4 GAMES later, we have a few Minor changes to weapons some nifty implementation of RPG xp to everything they can think of. and balancing that should have been done in the updates to the first game. Giving a game a 10 Should mean that game is Perfect and a new Standard for games,

As for single player, it was very good, for the 5 hours it took to beat. Do you realize $0.99 Iphone apps have longer stories?
If you keep giving these “$60 upates/Expansions” High ratings without taking a step back and realizing that these people are screwing you because they can. eventually they are going to make two COD’s a year for 60 each with no new content at all,

Also half the people who claim they “Are Amazing” at this game, Probably couldn’t pick Price out of a line up. Sorry for ranting, i was just pissed.