<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Castlevania: Lords of the Shadow Review	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gamingbolt.com/castlevania-lords-of-the-shadow-review/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gamingbolt.com/castlevania-lords-of-the-shadow-review</link>
	<description>Get a Bolt of Gaming Now!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2025 17:55:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Murat		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/castlevania-lords-of-the-shadow-review#comment-153548</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Murat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=14248#comment-153548</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/castlevania-lords-of-the-shadow-review#comment-66967&quot;&gt;tareq salah&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;/a&gt;As much as I enjoy the first one the way it is, it would be great for the sequel to have AA impenmleted, and a smooth, stable frame rate instead of a constantly fluctuating, uncapped one. Seeing more and more devs are making use of FXAA and MLAA, I would hope to see these impenmleted in the sequel. And perhaps a more efficient video codec instead of Bink Video (7.5GB for slightly less than an hour of 720p footage running at 25fps?) I don’t mind bloating the bit rate of the PS3 version but the Xbox 360 version having an extra disc as the result of that doesn’t sound like it’s worth the trouble, not to me. Of course, it would be best if those can be rendered in real-time.VN:R_U [1.9.12_1141](from 11 votes)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/castlevania-lords-of-the-shadow-review#comment-66967">tareq salah</a>.</p>
<p>As much as I enjoy the first one the way it is, it would be great for the sequel to have AA impenmleted, and a smooth, stable frame rate instead of a constantly fluctuating, uncapped one. Seeing more and more devs are making use of FXAA and MLAA, I would hope to see these impenmleted in the sequel. And perhaps a more efficient video codec instead of Bink Video (7.5GB for slightly less than an hour of 720p footage running at 25fps?) I don’t mind bloating the bit rate of the PS3 version but the Xbox 360 version having an extra disc as the result of that doesn’t sound like it’s worth the trouble, not to me. Of course, it would be best if those can be rendered in real-time.VN:R_U [1.9.12_1141](from 11 votes)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Musser64		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/castlevania-lords-of-the-shadow-review#comment-128514</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Musser64]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 21:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=14248#comment-128514</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Was a really good game!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was a really good game!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: tareq salah		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/castlevania-lords-of-the-shadow-review#comment-66967</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tareq salah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 07:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=14248#comment-66967</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[without a doubt it my favorite game of all time. i came to it with low expectations an was blown away. try to over look the bad parts and its perfect]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>without a doubt it my favorite game of all time. i came to it with low expectations an was blown away. try to over look the bad parts and its perfect</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
