If Sony were to have wanted more content it would have been forbidden due to the ‘POS’. Bottom line is Sony decided to innovate and push the medium forward, while other companies did the reverse.

Ahh I misread.

PS4 will be far more profitable to devs than PC, that’s why they favor it with timed or permanent exclusives. PS4 beats PC in price/performance for $400.

Watch Dogs is running sub-1080p on Xbox.

They’re called “multiplatform” games for a reason.

Go back to misterxturd’s blog and stay there.

LOL you realize he means the PS4 version is going to be superior, right?

Not that he’s insane like you and would cripple the PS4 version to look worse despite having stronger hardware, or put all the effort into the Xbox version.

I paid $199 for my Dreamcast 9/9/99, $299 for my PS2 the next year, so it was $100 more.

No. The PS3’s blu-ray drive was hurting itself more than anything else. The horribly low read speed of that is the reason most games have installs to the HDD.

And, games were larger in file size, most of the time, due to the need to duplicate assets and the like so the drive would spend less time seeking for data and more time reading data. You needed every milisecond of read you could get on that horribly slow hunk of junk.

The blu-ray drive was a hindrance, more often than not. But, some games pre-rendered cutscenes looked nicer, I guess. So, yay?

No PS3 exclusive had more content. Most of them were insanely small and linear.

Whatever.