Comments on: Crysis 2 PS3 version performs better than Xbox 360 version

By: unlimited porn

unlimited porn — Mon, 25 Jul 2011 02:33:25 +0000

honestly xbox360 is a let down to me ive been through 4 of them all malfunctioning i sold the last broken one to cash converters signed that form to get my money and ran like hell b4 they could plug it in.

By: RIP XBOX 360

RIP XBOX 360 — Fri, 03 Dec 2010 08:46:26 +0000

DAMN!!! I just bought an Xbox slim one month ago and the even more FUCKED UP SHIT is I cant play online with halo reach it say’s that “One or more players do not have a hard drive which is required for this playlist,” FUCK MEEEEEEEE THIS IS BULLSHIT!!!! THAT BLOODY THANG COST ME $500 RIGHT OUT OF MY WALLET!!!!!

By: crow

crow — Thu, 10 Jun 2010 21:17:13 +0000

In reply to Kevin.

lol no the ps3 and xbox are both the same price to buy silly ^.^ but the ps3 comes with a bunch of stuff that u gota pay extra for on the xbox… like 100$ for the wireless internet and 50$ a year for usage of internet… and rechage bateriy pack for each controller… and recharge kit… (not sure how much all that will put ya back…) but still the base unit will cost the same… as long as u dont plan on connecting to the internet… ^.^

By: Josh350

Josh350 — Thu, 27 May 2010 12:15:18 +0000

Actually yes, the crytek crew promotes Nvidia which is what the PS3 has, so it’s like exclusivity. Rather sad that it can only perform slightly better than the console which was released 1 year before the PS3. Just like comparing the iphone to the droid… old technology vs new. Eventhough droid does not perform much better than the iphone yet it does win on some departments just like the PS3 vs the 360 which is rather sad for having an extra year to upgrade. I’m more concerned about the hard core pc gamers, they get a dumb downed version of a game they have been waiting for years. Crysis was known for its graphics and physics, but many acclaim the new graphics seem very dumbed down. Which I have to agree.

By: Ferretmyster

Ferretmyster — Sun, 16 May 2010 18:08:14 +0000

Really if this generation just cares about graphics then thats not the whole reason of gaming, im pretty sure that the xbox gameplay will be even 2 ps3 and pc, but everyone knows that the ps3 will be superior due 2 the year and a half head start that it had from the 360, always think gameplay 1st then graphics 2nd.

By: stand mixers

stand mixers — Wed, 05 May 2010 06:09:25 +0000

Here we go again…comparing the performance of two 4-5 year old systems. One with slightly better performance on one particular game. Wow!

By: toys

toys — Mon, 03 May 2010 04:39:16 +0000

It has serious problems when its not the lead platform. dont ask me why but I think it has something to do with the architecture of the ps3. Look it up, whenever the ps3 is the lead platform its alot easier to make a 360 port and both end up looking better.

By: BocaRican

BocaRican — Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:25:44 +0000

You guys do realise that the original plan was to not even have the rsx! That’s right folks, ps3 was just going to ship with the cell, http://gamer.blorge.com/2010/01/05/ps3-smoothing-beyond-that-of-high-end-pc-graphics-card/

but sony realised it was going to be a program nightmare, so at the last minute they asked nivida for a kick ass graphics card. So as time goes on the plan is for developers to gradually get off the rsx crutch, which is only there to help lazy or less knowledgeable developers, I personelly think if sony would have left it out completly it would have been a disaster, but this is to show you that the cell isn’t your basic CPU but more similiar to a GPU,( the ps3 is nothing more then a GPU in sli with a 3.2ghz PPE) (opinion) The ps3 not only trumps the other competition but it also rivals current PC hardware in some areas (Link provided) That’s pretty impressive for 4 year old tech dont you think? And again I’m not saying in anyway that ps3 is better then PC b/c thats just not true but show me a PC that cost $300 and can look as good as a ps3, you cant

By: Sam

Sam — Tue, 20 Apr 2010 08:19:29 +0000

Finally a 3rd party game that the developers put time into the ps3 version

By: Lancer

Lancer — Sat, 17 Apr 2010 15:22:54 +0000

@Hellbinder

You should really go weep on your 360. The PS3 is factually a more powerful system. The only reason games have performed better on the 360 in the past is because it’s easier to develop for that platform than the PS3. Now that developers are figuring it out, it’ll only be a matter of time until all 360 games look inferior, and the system is revealed to be the Xbox 1.5 it always has been.
Have a pleasant day! 🙂