Comments on: Crysis 2 versus Killzone 2: HD Screenshot comparison

By: Scopes20

Scopes20 — Tue, 08 Mar 2011 10:43:51 +0000

In reply to Ipos.

mat_c, I agree with Ipos, i have played kz2, crysis, crysis wh & crysis 2 demo, crysis 1 is better graphics, it isnt out on consoles as they dont have hardware requirments so an official comparison is dificult, but visual from the eye, crysis 1 and WH both beat KZ2, crysis 2 i think is around the same as the graphics are dimmed down for console…

FYI – If anything, Consoles gamers complaing about pc gamers ruin the industry, PC GAMERS DESIGN YOUR GAMES!

By: shadowtm

shadowtm — Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:34:58 +0000

Crysis 2 isn’t as good looking as Crysis 1, because it had to be dumbed down to even run on consoles. Killzone 2 isn’t much of a comparison though, and to be honest Killzone 3 hasn’t really improved much, and seeing as how KZ2 and 3 are PS3 exclusives, it’s hard to compare. Crysis 2 will more than likely have more graphic capability and options on the PC since that’s where it was born. At the end of the day, I hand it over to Crysis 2 and the Crytek engine. I’ve played the demo, enjoyed the gameplay, and like the look and feel of it better than when I played KZ2. Killzone 2 is good, but the gameplay is groggy. I could go on, but this is how I feel about it.

By: Shubhankar Parijat

Shubhankar Parijat — Tue, 13 Jul 2010 07:44:34 +0000

Wow, Crysis 2 looks better, but only just. Killzone 2 has a bit rough edges here and there, but it’s almost on par with the sequel to the best looking game ever created! Wow, Sony, well done, great job! I never realized Killzone 2 looked so good. I’m sure KZ 3 will look ever better, maybe even better than Crysis 2…

By: the guy

the guy — Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:14:15 +0000

guys most of you don’t know is the killzone 2 engine has changed for killzone 3 and if you have killzone 2 behind the bullet on psn you can see the diff between kz2 & kz3 and kz3 is fully 110% real time, full destruction and much more. it does look better then crysis 2 (ONTHE PS3 & XBOX 360) and another thing some don’t get is the only way crysis 2 can win is cos it’s based of a real city! unlike killzone 2 & 3 so basically there both the same!!!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 29 May 2010 05:08:47 +0000

I personally enjoyed Killzone 2 quite a bit, but compared to Crysis 2 it is NUKED out of the water! It’s going to look like crap on consoles though (30 fps).

I hope Crytek don’t screw it up, the original Crysis sure set some pretty high standards for the second.

By: jimbo

jimbo — Fri, 28 May 2010 06:42:21 +0000

dont u guys realise this is xbox 360 crytek havent released ps3 or pc screenshots yet.

By: daniel

daniel — Sun, 02 May 2010 06:05:15 +0000

Killzone 2 is better looking. Some of you guys are stupid, good effects but terrible graphics. What a dumbass remark. The game has awsome graphics with awsome texture and details. Crysis 2 only look slightly better in some of those pics. SLIGHTLY is the key word, which means a little.

By: Ray

Ray — Tue, 06 Apr 2010 23:01:07 +0000

In reply to Joohanh. Crysis 2 will be performing with Cryengine 3... there is no doubt Crysis 2 will look amazing on the pc, but will it look great on consoles? I am more looking forward towards Killzone 3; that will be the game to dethrone Crysis 2 (console version).

By: RIchdad

RIchdad — Sun, 28 Mar 2010 18:55:02 +0000

Yep PC version all the way lower price, better graphics, free online and mods.

By: Nos Ertilia

Nos Ertilia — Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:19:53 +0000

In reply to digital_me. It's amazing how well Killzone 2 holds up. In some areas it beats Crysis 2, but Crysis 2 shatters it. But KZ2 is a year old.