Comments on: Crytek: PS3/360 “so behind the curve” but surprised devs can squeeze some more out of them

By: mazty

mazty — Fri, 14 Dec 2012 13:40:00 +0000

What a retard. People didn’t complain about the options in Crysis, they complained because it was a piss-poorly optimised engine. You then went and gave PC users a shitty port with Crysis 2 and wonder why they complained? Either this guy is spouting PR bullshit or is a complete retard who has no idea what users actually think of his product.

By: BrothaDave

BrothaDave — Fri, 14 Dec 2012 05:13:00 +0000

lighting and particle effects are things Guerilla did a real good job with in Killzone 2 and 3 but the games mechanics threw people off. the effects in Killzone are real good but different than Crysis 2 and Far Cry 3. I’m just talking about console games I know PC trumps all in graphics but what about effects on PC?

By: Paradox

Paradox — Fri, 14 Dec 2012 01:20:00 +0000

In reply to ohnoesaz. Yeah man...pretty sure he's talking about Far Cry 3. AC3 is a good-looking game, but it's not anything Earth-shattering.

By: andezzat

andezzat — Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:31:00 +0000

DEFINETLY gonna look great. Many games with not good enough textures, but a lot of great lighting effects and techniques added to their graphics made those games look pretty good I’d have to say. Especially in open environments which Crysis has a lot of, lighting plays a major role. It’s good to see them focus more on it 🙂

By: Marcus

Marcus — Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:20:00 +0000

Far cry 3 for sure

By: ohnoesaz

ohnoesaz — Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:38:00 +0000

In reply to RM. hes talking about assassins creed 3

By: RM

RM — Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:52:00 +0000

“I mean, there is a game that came out recently, that I’m not going to mention, that looks really good. I mean, I’m surprised at how good it looks on consoles”—definitely FARCRY 3