Comments on: Dead Space 3’s generic box art is a drastic change when compared to the first two

By: MattS71

MattS71 — Mon, 28 Jan 2013 01:47:00 +0000

Dead Space 2 was a boring, generic cover, IMO. DS3 looks nice….and in the end, WHO THE FUCK CARES about a cover. Its the game that I care about…..

By: What?

What? — Sat, 26 Jan 2013 18:32:00 +0000

In reply to Christian Capitula. When Dead Space 2 released, EA said it was outselling the first one, 2-1. So there is a fanbase,

By: Christian Capitula

Christian Capitula — Sat, 26 Jan 2013 17:12:00 +0000

I’m really sad…after finishing 2 I was worried there wouldn’t be a 3rd due to lack of fanbase. It’s not a mainstream shooter. If the only way they got a 3rd was to make a game that EA told them, I almost wish they didn’t do a 3rd. Only one more week to find out how much EA ruined this amazing franchise.

By: Bob Obb

Bob Obb — Sat, 26 Jan 2013 16:36:00 +0000

Hey look, blue and orange. You definitely don’t see enough blue and orange these days.

By: CharlesGooding

CharlesGooding — Sat, 26 Jan 2013 14:12:00 +0000

Hey Bumbaclot, Dead Space was released in 2008,

By: Phatty

Phatty — Sat, 26 Jan 2013 12:54:00 +0000

It’s nothing incredible but it’s not bad.
I was surprised by the demo. Looking forward to it especially since I’m a big fan of the original The Thing.

By: Okay

Okay — Sat, 26 Jan 2013 00:37:00 +0000

…don’t know what you’re talking about, Dead Space 2’s boxart is just as generic. Dead Space 1’s was amazing though. Don’t care though, I’m still looking forward to Dead Space 3.

By: ThePokeMaster

ThePokeMaster — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 23:38:00 +0000

That’s not Skyrim’s box art.
http://www.mln.com.au/img/files/3685/The-Elder-Scrolls-V-Skyrim_PS3-boxart.jpg