DF is just trying to damage control the 2tflop power difference, PERIOD.

The 900p vs 1080p was never noticeable and I doubt that we’ll notice much of difference between the checkerboard UPSCALING (hehe) and 4K NATIVE resolution. However, when DF runs its typical “vs” analysis they will have to give the win to the Scorpio version because if they found “more” grass in the PS4 multiplat with 0.5tflop advantage over XB1, then they will SURELY find a few extra trees in the Scorpio’s with its 2TFLOP advantage over the weaker PS Pro..:)

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/17c0a97d1a74d59d07e35a1452ac6483843e58d9566bebcaf64fe9c27f871251.jpg

well everyone has their own opinion. i’m even sure some people have said horizon 1 looks better than 2 and 3.
3 has better lighting, reflection, tessellation, water accumulation and representation, more foliage etc

Obviously. I thought 2K was 1440p.

And you obviously hate PS4, hypocrite!

Says the degenerate.

Says the other degenerate.

And we’ve found the Xbox Degenerate drone Force’s leader, congratulation, you’re a tool.

All what “power” you XRat? You’re the only one scared, because Scorpio is barely going to look any better than Pro, and will come out over a yr later and probably at a higher price tag. DF has already stated the difference between Pro’s uoscale and native 4K is smaller than the difference between 900p and 1080p, you XMoron.

You do know that 2K 60fps is 1080p/60fps right? Obviously not.

What graphics update? It looks worst than FH2. And see a lot of dithering and aliasing in this pics.