Let’s revisit this argument when the PC version of Project CARS comes out and see how “Impressive” it is.

The same processor has xbone. Sony could always over clock theirs with a patch. They don’t need to since the gpu is half a teraflop more powerful than xbone.

Wow. You know for sure it would be foliage? How? I only targeted rain because the article is about rain. The point of what I was suggesting is that DC rain looks good because the game engine is doing less. If it was open world, it would’ve had to give up something. Ar least we both agree on that. How do we know? Because despite them using cheaper AA + going the lighting friendly deffered rendering, they only managed a locked 30fps closed circuit. That is telling you that they are maxed out. So if they go open world something gotta give. And my moneys on anything CPU intensive. But you’re 100% sure it will be foilage? So being that you’re so good at specifics, why not less richer textures? Or less polys for the environment etc? How about all that new physics they’d had to implement to anticipate the sudden change of terrain, vehicle interaction with terrain, during a stormy weather so on & so on? Mind you I’m no expert. I’m just thinking about the bigger picture. So Explain to me why you’re so sure it’s going to be only foliage?

This is what the devs got a couple of months after launch, with 9 months of a delay along with being a simple track racer and you think they would get the same effects in an open world environment? That’s more than overly optimistic.

Eh if DC was open world it would still have a great weather system.The rain would look the same,the only details i can see dropping is the foliage detail.The game overall could still look very close to how it looks now. Also i don’t think open world is always the best route for racing games.

ROLF you mean the very same processor inside of your Gimpbox one?

ROFL yet most racing games are closed courses.