<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Epic Games&#8217; Next Title &#8220;To Push Next Gen Graphics&#8221; &#8211; Studio Co-founder	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gamingbolt.com/epic-games-next-title-to-push-next-gen-graphics-studio-co-founder/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gamingbolt.com/epic-games-next-title-to-push-next-gen-graphics-studio-co-founder</link>
	<description>Get a Bolt of Gaming Now!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 10:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Psionicinversion		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/epic-games-next-title-to-push-next-gen-graphics-studio-co-founder#comment-226947</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Psionicinversion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 10:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=194028#comment-226947</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[if it need 3 times the budget then yeah probably as graphics get more detailed youve got stuff like PBR adding to development time, global illumination etc theres just more stuff to do to make a game look great as power increases so its prolly harder and harder to find the money to do it... 


kind of like the hobbits 48 fps $500million thing that i havnt seen, most people werent impressed alot ppl thought it looked weird maybe us gamers find it good cus were used to high frame rate visuals and stuff but its prolly why the hobbit is in 3 parts whilst the book was in 2 parts cus he needs make some money back. Personally i found Hobbit 2 abit of a let down, gets through all this boring stuff gets in the mountain then the bit i was waiting for ages for smaug to go and kick some @ss then it ends and i though uggh what a let down... least hobbit 3 should be action packed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if it need 3 times the budget then yeah probably as graphics get more detailed youve got stuff like PBR adding to development time, global illumination etc theres just more stuff to do to make a game look great as power increases so its prolly harder and harder to find the money to do it&#8230; </p>
<p>kind of like the hobbits 48 fps $500million thing that i havnt seen, most people werent impressed alot ppl thought it looked weird maybe us gamers find it good cus were used to high frame rate visuals and stuff but its prolly why the hobbit is in 3 parts whilst the book was in 2 parts cus he needs make some money back. Personally i found Hobbit 2 abit of a let down, gets through all this boring stuff gets in the mountain then the bit i was waiting for ages for smaug to go and kick some @ss then it ends and i though uggh what a let down&#8230; least hobbit 3 should be action packed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
