Comments on: Fallout 4: Deciding on Scale

By: chris9465

chris9465 — Sun, 26 Oct 2014 07:34:00 +0000

If the rumor of boston holds up…..it needs some NYC DLC or just add another huge NYC sandbox to the tittle…..what i want to see is a quest side or main between a red sox faction and a yankee faction lol with the stadiums….if it is just boston Fenway park needs to be included in someway shape or form…..

By: d0x360

d0x360 — Tue, 21 Oct 2014 15:36:00 +0000

In reply to Robin.

Even releasing it later with turned down effects will be hampering to progress.

The problem is when making a game that can work across multiple generations of hardware you have to make concessions so that it will work on older platforms. Concessions that effect basic design of the game.

The only way to properly do it is the way Microsoft did with forza horizon 2. They made a new engine for the Xbox one version and had a different studio copy as much of the new game as possible while the main studio just went crazy and did what ever they wanted.

On the surface they appear to be the same but the difference is much bigger than just graphics. If Bethesda went that route I’d be fine with it. Ubi soft is doing something similar with assassins creed.

By: Robin

Robin — Tue, 21 Oct 2014 15:30:00 +0000

In reply to d0x360. I thought you meant like keeping it locked for a specific platform. lol My bad. I do think that it wouldn't be the worst thing to release a pretty heavily neutered version of the game for the older generation of consoles. Like have the graphics turned way down and whatnot and just release it 6 or so months later as to give them time to tweak it.

By: d0x360

d0x360 — Tue, 21 Oct 2014 13:37:00 +0000

In reply to Robin.

Supporting the 360 and ps3 does nothing but hold back progress for xbox one, ps4 and especially PC. If people aren’t ready to upgrade that’s on them but those that have shouldn’t need to sacrifice quality to appease hold outs.

The current gen market is already big enough to guarantee large sales.

By: Robin

Robin — Tue, 21 Oct 2014 05:50:00 +0000

In reply to d0x360. What would you life for them to play on? Honestly, it'd be pretty dumb for them to have either of them not be cross gen. Why would you want to limit your market?

By: Siou1927

Siou1927 — Sun, 19 Oct 2014 19:25:00 +0000

In reply to d0x360.

ESTEL

This site is giving about 800$ daily. You can just do this simple task daily from home and have more time with friends & family; Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had. It sounds unbelievable. Its best site that i found till now.

This is what I do,

➜➜➜➜➜➜➜➜➜ check₄₄．ｃｏｍ

JUST GO TO THE SITE TO BELIEVE

By: d0x360

d0x360 — Sun, 19 Oct 2014 15:29:00 +0000

I’ve never in my life seen a site cover a game that hasn’t even been announced. Someone here really loved fallout 3 lol. This is like the 100th article about fallout 4 this year.

For your sake I hope they unveil it soon and I hope its the most amazing game ever conceived but I gotta be honest…I’d much rather them announce a new elder scrolls game first and I pray PRAY neither of them (elder scrolls or fallout) are cross gen titles. I also pray that they don’t use the worlds worst engine…gamebryo.