<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Fallout 4 Review &#8211; Welcome Back To The Wasteland	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-review/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-review</link>
	<description>Get a Bolt of Gaming Now!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2015 15:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-review#comment-276438</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2015 15:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=248127#comment-276438</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-review#comment-276424&quot;&gt;d0x360&lt;/a&gt;.

Wow. That&#039;s some down to earth, honest impressions lol. Fallout&#039;s gameplay looks good, but I&#039;m sunk in Halo and Tomb Raider, didn&#039;t even beat Witcher 3 yet, so sadly I gotta skip Fallout. But ur impressions makes it easier haha. And people gave me crap about simply saying the graphics &quot;are underwhelming&quot;...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-review#comment-276424">d0x360</a>.</p>
<p>Wow. That&#8217;s some down to earth, honest impressions lol. Fallout&#8217;s gameplay looks good, but I&#8217;m sunk in Halo and Tomb Raider, didn&#8217;t even beat Witcher 3 yet, so sadly I gotta skip Fallout. But ur impressions makes it easier haha. And people gave me crap about simply saying the graphics &#8220;are underwhelming&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: d0x360		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-review#comment-276424</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[d0x360]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=248127#comment-276424</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-review#comment-276380&quot;&gt;Mark&lt;/a&gt;.

Alright so the game runs on ultra at 60fps most of the time.  No amd drivers yet so I imagine between that and maybe a patch to the game it will run better.

Shooting feels OK, it certainly doesn&#039;t feel as good as a real shooter but it doesn&#039;t feel bad like fallout 3 did.

I&#039;ve played a few hours and so far it&#039;s nothing special.  Its literally fallout 3 with a new coat of paint.  A really ugly coat of paint.  The world looks OK but the characters look really bad and very out of place in a brand new game.

Dont play it expecting something new and fresh.  Bethesda basically just took some lessons learned from fallout 3 and skyrim and rolled them into this.  All of the &quot;new&quot; stuff exists as mods for fallout 3 already too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-review#comment-276380">Mark</a>.</p>
<p>Alright so the game runs on ultra at 60fps most of the time.  No amd drivers yet so I imagine between that and maybe a patch to the game it will run better.</p>
<p>Shooting feels OK, it certainly doesn&#8217;t feel as good as a real shooter but it doesn&#8217;t feel bad like fallout 3 did.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve played a few hours and so far it&#8217;s nothing special.  Its literally fallout 3 with a new coat of paint.  A really ugly coat of paint.  The world looks OK but the characters look really bad and very out of place in a brand new game.</p>
<p>Dont play it expecting something new and fresh.  Bethesda basically just took some lessons learned from fallout 3 and skyrim and rolled them into this.  All of the &#8220;new&#8221; stuff exists as mods for fallout 3 already too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dolores Becker		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-review#comment-276404</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dolores Becker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2015 06:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=248127#comment-276404</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-review#comment-276357&quot;&gt;Pazz&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;b&gt;This year I have made 72,000 dollars so far with my pc and I am a university student . I am linked with a business entity that outsource online jobs . I heard about it previous year and now I have made a great cash . It is very friendly to it&#039;s users and I am just so happy to have that option …..

www.yfuusa.da.cx&lt;/b&gt;
➔12]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-review#comment-276357">Pazz</a>.</p>
<p><b>This year I have made 72,000 dollars so far with my pc and I am a university student . I am linked with a business entity that outsource online jobs . I heard about it previous year and now I have made a great cash . It is very friendly to it&#8217;s users and I am just so happy to have that option …..</p>
<p><a href="http://www.yfuusa.da.cx" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.yfuusa.da.cx</a></b><br />
➔12</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: d0x360		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-review#comment-276381</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[d0x360]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=248127#comment-276381</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-review#comment-276380&quot;&gt;Mark&lt;/a&gt;.

I did yea.  It looks like they removed a filter Bethesda is using and it kinda makes colors in certain areas pop more.  I probably won&#039;t install it at least not now.  I&#039;ll play the game as Bethesda intended and after I&#039;ve finished I&#039;ll mess with mods.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-review#comment-276380">Mark</a>.</p>
<p>I did yea.  It looks like they removed a filter Bethesda is using and it kinda makes colors in certain areas pop more.  I probably won&#8217;t install it at least not now.  I&#8217;ll play the game as Bethesda intended and after I&#8217;ve finished I&#8217;ll mess with mods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-review#comment-276380</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 20:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=248127#comment-276380</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-review#comment-276378&quot;&gt;d0x360&lt;/a&gt;.

Tomb Raider looks amazing! But did u see the Fallout 4 mod &quot;Enhanced Wasteland&quot; I think it is? They&#039;re gonna go nuts with mods. I&#039;ll prolly go to Dsogaming.com to preview them in the future. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-review#comment-276378">d0x360</a>.</p>
<p>Tomb Raider looks amazing! But did u see the Fallout 4 mod &#8220;Enhanced Wasteland&#8221; I think it is? They&#8217;re gonna go nuts with mods. I&#8217;ll prolly go to Dsogaming.com to preview them in the future. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: d0x360		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-review#comment-276378</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[d0x360]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 20:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=248127#comment-276378</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-review#comment-276377&quot;&gt;Mark&lt;/a&gt;.

Well I plan on staying up till its unlocked on steam.  Hopefully its midnight EST otherwise I&#039;ll probably fall asleep.

I should in theory be able to run it on ultra @ 1080p 60fps but amd hasn&#039;t released fully optimized drivers yet but they could always do so tomorrow. If for some reason they don&#039;t I&#039;ll probably focus on tomb raider on the x1 until they do.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-review#comment-276377">Mark</a>.</p>
<p>Well I plan on staying up till its unlocked on steam.  Hopefully its midnight EST otherwise I&#8217;ll probably fall asleep.</p>
<p>I should in theory be able to run it on ultra @ 1080p 60fps but amd hasn&#8217;t released fully optimized drivers yet but they could always do so tomorrow. If for some reason they don&#8217;t I&#8217;ll probably focus on tomb raider on the x1 until they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-review#comment-276377</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 20:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=248127#comment-276377</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-review#comment-276371&quot;&gt;d0x360&lt;/a&gt;.

Yeah the shooting looks stiff regardless. Saw some guy fighting off turrets, eww. The game looks good tho.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-review#comment-276371">d0x360</a>.</p>
<p>Yeah the shooting looks stiff regardless. Saw some guy fighting off turrets, eww. The game looks good tho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: d0x360		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-review#comment-276371</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[d0x360]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 19:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=248127#comment-276371</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-review#comment-276370&quot;&gt;Mark&lt;/a&gt;.

TL;DR I did.  They feel pretty much the same as 30.  Clunky.  That said 60 smooths out some visual issues and faster load times are appreciated.  I have no comparison for this game but witcher 3 loads and fast travels in 7 seconds on my PC.

Hopefully fallout 4 is better in this regard.  They have id software to help them and reviews seem to agree shooting feels a lot better than previous games but everything built around the shooting is basically taken from fallout 3 so its clunky.  That&#039;s to be expected since they are using the same engine that they used in morrowind.  Obviously its been updated and tweaked but its still the same at its core.

That&#039;s where I took issue with this review.  It just heaps praise all over the game as if it&#039;s flawless when we all know Bethesda doesn&#039;t make games that way.  It was to be expected since this site has basically posted a fallout 4 story every week for the last 2 years.  Constant red herring articles filled with nothing but speculation.  It was clear they either had a fallout fanboy on staff or they are one of the most deceptive clickbaiting sites around.

I&#039;d prefer to believe the former since from time to time they have decent content.  Funny thing is I&#039;d click more often if they were less clickbaity and I know a lot of people feel the same way about it (on any site) just check reddit where they absolutely bury sites that constantly post clickbait.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-review#comment-276370">Mark</a>.</p>
<p>TL;DR I did.  They feel pretty much the same as 30.  Clunky.  That said 60 smooths out some visual issues and faster load times are appreciated.  I have no comparison for this game but witcher 3 loads and fast travels in 7 seconds on my PC.</p>
<p>Hopefully fallout 4 is better in this regard.  They have id software to help them and reviews seem to agree shooting feels a lot better than previous games but everything built around the shooting is basically taken from fallout 3 so its clunky.  That&#8217;s to be expected since they are using the same engine that they used in morrowind.  Obviously its been updated and tweaked but its still the same at its core.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s where I took issue with this review.  It just heaps praise all over the game as if it&#8217;s flawless when we all know Bethesda doesn&#8217;t make games that way.  It was to be expected since this site has basically posted a fallout 4 story every week for the last 2 years.  Constant red herring articles filled with nothing but speculation.  It was clear they either had a fallout fanboy on staff or they are one of the most deceptive clickbaiting sites around.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d prefer to believe the former since from time to time they have decent content.  Funny thing is I&#8217;d click more often if they were less clickbaity and I know a lot of people feel the same way about it (on any site) just check reddit where they absolutely bury sites that constantly post clickbait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-review#comment-276370</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 19:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=248127#comment-276370</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-review#comment-276347&quot;&gt;d0x360&lt;/a&gt;.

U got it for PC right? I&#039;ve always wondered how Bethesda&#039;s rpgs feel running at 60 frames. I would have to get so used to that ish.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-review#comment-276347">d0x360</a>.</p>
<p>U got it for PC right? I&#8217;ve always wondered how Bethesda&#8217;s rpgs feel running at 60 frames. I would have to get so used to that ish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Pazz		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-review#comment-276357</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pazz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=248127#comment-276357</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[https://twitter.com/DCDeacon/status/654400850316668930?ref_src]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://twitter.com/DCDeacon/status/654400850316668930?ref_src" rel="nofollow ugc">https://twitter.com/DCDeacon/status/654400850316668930?ref_src</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
