Comments on: Fallout 4: Why A Multiplayer Component Could Ruin The Upcoming RPG

By: Shathrax

Shathrax — Thu, 04 Jun 2015 17:07:00 +0000

Multiplayer can mean many things but honestly a friends-only multiplayer aspect to this game would in my opinion really be a good thing as long as it doesn’t the game at it’s core. But yeah if ur talking about multiplayer on a larger scale i can only agree that i would be a very bad move.

By: Nation of Masturbation

Nation of Masturbation — Fri, 01 May 2015 01:29:00 +0000

In reply to Will Bontemps. That would be equally as boring like DayZ.

By: GotNews4Ya

GotNews4Ya — Wed, 08 Apr 2015 19:25:00 +0000

In reply to Jeremy Alexander.

I am willing to guess that they announce Dishonored 2, Fallout 4, a Sequel to Wolfenstein and… a New Elder Scrolls coming out Late 2016 early 2017.. they don’t care about a console port of ESO… the new Elder Scrolls that is years out is not going to effect the popularity of ESO.

By: Will Bontemps

Will Bontemps — Tue, 07 Apr 2015 10:43:00 +0000

I like the idea of a fallout setting like gta online. Everyone fending for themselves in the wasteland, WAR haha

By: Chad Folk

Chad Folk — Tue, 07 Apr 2015 00:03:00 +0000

if it is going to be multiplayer maybe your friends can help with missions explore in on stuff like the computer playerstrade equipment money whatever between friends you know might be interesting that way

By: David Spracklen

David Spracklen — Mon, 06 Apr 2015 21:53:00 +0000

Maybe they could make dungeon instances; arenas or co-op maps that are multi-player – that would be ok. But leave the core game alone!

By: Guest

Guest — Mon, 06 Apr 2015 21:08:00 +0000

Not every game needs multiplayer!!!! More people =/= better!! MAYBE “co-op” but you can’t have a deep story with 100+ others running around doing the same stuff as you… Look at TES. Look at KOTOR. Multiplayer RUINED those games.

By: Jeremy Alexander

Jeremy Alexander — Mon, 06 Apr 2015 16:55:00 +0000

As long as I can play through the game in single player mode, I would love to bring a friend along for the next go through. I don’t want a MMORPG, but a little light co-op would make both Fallout and Elder Scrolls even better. This article is pointless though as Todd Howard has stated in almost every interview he has ever done that although he might consider limited co-op someday, that he sees Fallout and Elder Scrolls as single player only. Larger scale multiplayer versions would likely be done by companies like Zenimax along the lines of the much improved ESO.

By: Jeremy Alexander

Jeremy Alexander — Mon, 06 Apr 2015 16:52:00 +0000

In reply to Rustyrivet250 .. Right, that's why they spent millions on the license, went to court to defend it, and stated that they were going to make Fallout 4. They are not going to announce another Elder Scrolls and step on Zenimax feet while they are launching ESO on consoles and they have called their first ever E3 press event.

By: Mojo Rising

Mojo Rising — Mon, 06 Apr 2015 16:51:00 +0000

People seem to forget that Bethesda bought the rights to Wolfenstein in 2014. Who’s to say Josh Hamric is working on Fallout 4?

Simmer down. We know absolutely nothing about what Bethesda is doing. Why all the worry?