Comments on: Fallout 4: Why It Should Stick To Single Player Campaign Mode Only https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-why-it-should-stick-to-single-player-campaign-mode-only Get a Bolt of Gaming Now! Mon, 02 Nov 2015 12:31:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3 By: Kallol Paul https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-why-it-should-stick-to-single-player-campaign-mode-only#comment-275323 Mon, 02 Nov 2015 12:31:00 +0000 http://gamingbolt.com/?p=218099#comment-275323 In reply to Bora Bosna.

Else each single will be valueless..meaning less …! We enjoy being social only…!

]]> By: Kyle Posey https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-why-it-should-stick-to-single-player-campaign-mode-only#comment-247629 Mon, 05 Jan 2015 18:05:00 +0000 http://gamingbolt.com/?p=218099#comment-247629 No multiplayer.

]]> By: jznlv https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-why-it-should-stick-to-single-player-campaign-mode-only#comment-247562 Mon, 05 Jan 2015 04:06:00 +0000 http://gamingbolt.com/?p=218099#comment-247562 There is no need to add a crappy multiplayer aka dragon age/mass effect to one of the better single player games out there. Please fight the evil temptation of crappy multiplayer so you can sell 99cent dlcs

]]> By: pangamers https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-why-it-should-stick-to-single-player-campaign-mode-only#comment-247204 Fri, 02 Jan 2015 12:02:00 +0000 http://gamingbolt.com/?p=218099#comment-247204 Great article, and entirely agree. Been a Fallout fan for ages and love just wandering the plains waiting for random events to happen!

]]> By: Collin Nonapplicable https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-why-it-should-stick-to-single-player-campaign-mode-only#comment-247031 Tue, 30 Dec 2014 20:30:00 +0000 http://gamingbolt.com/?p=218099#comment-247031 I think if they would do it right and stop with the whole “less is more” attitute toward multiplayer gaming it might work. Like oldschool multiplayer, that wasn’t MMO, worked fine on a lot of other games.

]]> By: Speely https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-why-it-should-stick-to-single-player-campaign-mode-only#comment-247027 Tue, 30 Dec 2014 19:43:00 +0000 http://gamingbolt.com/?p=218099#comment-247027 I would be okay with a 2-player co-op option, I have a buddy who loves the Fallout series as much as I do and it would be fun to play together. But please, for the love of all that is holy and good and right in the world, please don’t go making it an MMO.

]]> By: jusme https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-why-it-should-stick-to-single-player-campaign-mode-only#comment-247002 Tue, 30 Dec 2014 09:57:00 +0000 http://gamingbolt.com/?p=218099#comment-247002 Happy with single player. Gotta be sandboxy and with stuff to keep doing like Skyrim but better missions. A randomised map generator would be nice too.

]]> By: Alex https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-why-it-should-stick-to-single-player-campaign-mode-only#comment-246986 Tue, 30 Dec 2014 01:19:00 +0000 http://gamingbolt.com/?p=218099#comment-246986 Financially speaking Elder Scrolls Online has not performed very well so it does not make sense to make a Fallout online spin-off given the same target audience. Multiplayer ruins the immersion that Elder Scrolls and Fallout fans love about the first-person rpg genre. The little details that we enjoy so much in the single-player experience are simply no where to be found in multiplayer installments.

]]> By: paul fletcher https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-why-it-should-stick-to-single-player-campaign-mode-only#comment-246813 Mon, 29 Dec 2014 14:10:00 +0000 http://gamingbolt.com/?p=218099#comment-246813 Bethesda would be making the biggest mistake a games company could make by adding multiplayer to tes and fallout. These two franchises are to of the biggest out there and are all in my top ten all time favourites list. Please Bethesda for the love of gaming DON’T DO IT.

]]> By: Mrunreal . https://gamingbolt.com/fallout-4-why-it-should-stick-to-single-player-campaign-mode-only#comment-246810 Mon, 29 Dec 2014 11:10:00 +0000 http://gamingbolt.com/?p=218099#comment-246810 Sorry but Fallout 4 Co op would be amazing just like Borderlands is.

]]>