<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Ghost Recon: Future Soldier Review	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gamingbolt.com/ghost-recon-future-soldier-review/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gamingbolt.com/ghost-recon-future-soldier-review</link>
	<description>Get a Bolt of Gaming Now!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 20:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Blukrow		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/ghost-recon-future-soldier-review#comment-152931</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blukrow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 22:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=93095#comment-152931</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[8.0 ?  Where are you people coming from, that can write a review about a game that doesnt even come close to a 5.0!  It all comes down to PLAYABILITY and GRFS doesnt have it except for online play.  If you compare GRFS to GR2, you would know what I mean.  The game play and in game content in GR2 over powers GRFS. Why?  Im not a fan of COD campaigns but atleast Black-Ops was a complete game coming with alot of in game content: 1) Zombies-solo/co-op/online play. 2) local Co-Op with 8 modes to play and 15 maps. 3) Online multi-player modes.  By not having local Co-Op in the game, makes the game a DUD.  Gameplay and how much fun you have in playing the game is the most important thing.  Take the online equation out of the mix and what do you have:  Black-Ops-10.0,  MW3-8.5,  GR2-8.0 and GRFS-3.0.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>8.0 ?  Where are you people coming from, that can write a review about a game that doesnt even come close to a 5.0!  It all comes down to PLAYABILITY and GRFS doesnt have it except for online play.  If you compare GRFS to GR2, you would know what I mean.  The game play and in game content in GR2 over powers GRFS. Why?  Im not a fan of COD campaigns but atleast Black-Ops was a complete game coming with alot of in game content: 1) Zombies-solo/co-op/online play. 2) local Co-Op with 8 modes to play and 15 maps. 3) Online multi-player modes.  By not having local Co-Op in the game, makes the game a DUD.  Gameplay and how much fun you have in playing the game is the most important thing.  Take the online equation out of the mix and what do you have:  Black-Ops-10.0,  MW3-8.5,  GR2-8.0 and GRFS-3.0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
