here’s my take on games.
ever since graphics evolved, its been nothing but war about it. who has better, who can make better. as graphics got better, the gameplay/story, especially story, has gotten worse. theres some games or franchises that pop up here and there that outshine others. final fantasy died a long time ago. i think 9 or 10 was it. then it was all about scenery, graphics and gameplay, screw the story. franchises like these need to stop at its peek. metal gear solid should’ve stopped at 3 (though 4 surprised me), but people bitched and whined about how they wanna know what happened before and what happens next. most of the time they do it for the money, not cause they love you. they’re at work or at home swimming in their money while you dumbasses are fighting over which has better fucking graphics. castlevnania should have stopped at 4. then more shitty games come out, all about graphics. my library isn’t that big from ps1 to ps3, less than 100 altogether. i’ve rented because ive suspected shit. the few that pop up and focus on story while maintaining graphics (uncharted series, god of war, even mgs) are great breaks from the shitty games. i say break because im used to it. i still enjoy some nes, snes and early playstation games far better than games these days. simple gameplay. just a few buttons. not all this fucking shit just to look and move around, aim and strike.to strike on old games, was one button. ONE. some games today. its 2-4. dont get me started on armored core. even the first was a joke. i could care less what you have to say, cause right now when im done, im going out of the house, something you all should do at LEAST once a week. besides school or work. get a life, oh wait, that’s probably what ps home is to you.

Q = With God of War III we saw your studio make use of the real power of the PlayStation 3; do you think that it is possible to go even further with the team’s next title?

A = Absolutely, we can do much more with it. I don’t know if we are even close to 50% of PlayStation 3’s power at this point.

http://ugdb.com/article/view/interview-god-of-war-iii-ps3/

PS3 is only getting warmed up boyzzzz, Just wait for KillZone 3 ‘o)

Joe, directors of games say lots of things in interviews , but as everyone will tell you, not all they say is correct. Things change when directors say nothing would change.

Now all i can say is wait until it is made Official, You will see that the game is 60 FPS ” Like Dante’s Inferno “

No, it is 60fps while walking around the environments just exploring, and 30fps when you start getting enemies on screen.

the games director just came out and said this exact thing, how can you still disagree? lol. if you had played the demo, you would know this as it does the exact same thing in that, only it never reaches the full 60fps at all.

“Furthermore, Stig Asmussen, the director of the game, revealed in an interview with Arabic gaming site N4GA that his title will have a variable frame rate from 30 to 60 frames per second depending on the amount of action on screen.”

so much for “Remember when i said about GOW III runs at 60-FPS, well as i told everyone ( JOE ) lol. it is now getting talked about on the NET so will soon be made official.”, hey LBDz? lol

oh and LBDz, just to prove a point to you:

http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-6894-Video-Game-News-Examiner~y2010m1d18-God-of-War-III-to-run-on-720p-natively-with-variable-frame-rate

“Furthermore, Stig Asmussen, the director of the game, revealed in an interview with Arabic gaming site N4GA that his title will have a variable frame rate from 30 to 60 frames per second depending on the amount of action on screen.”

so not only does it not play at OVER 60fps like you claim, it often drops to 30fps. now seeing as this is the director of the game saying this, wouldnt it be fair to assume that you are wrong in saying it will play at over 60fps constantly?