Comments on: Halo: Reach- Revolution or Evolution?

By: Musser64

Musser64 — Wed, 21 Mar 2012 11:11:53 +0000

I knew it was gonna be bad since day 1

By: tareq salah

tareq salah — Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:56:24 +0000

im a play station owner, but i will admit that if it wasn’t for halo, fps wouldnt be as it is today. its both a revolution and evolution.

By: rak33n

rak33n — Mon, 14 Feb 2011 17:12:34 +0000

hope they make a reach 2

By: VGFan

VGFan — Mon, 13 Sep 2010 20:36:37 +0000

Walmart is offering a $20 Gift card with the purchase of Halo Reach or the Halo bundle. I’m headed there at midnight!

By: ntlgnce

ntlgnce — Wed, 01 Sep 2010 17:01:17 +0000

Compairing Halo to a PC game is like compairing rocks to mountains. Lots of people have rocks they like, But few have actually seen the mountain to say WOW thats so much better then the rocks. See your using game sales, and your personal opinion to claim a game the best. In my opinion a game made back in 1995, has better game play then any of the halo series. The only thing halo has going for it is its the best CONSOLE game to date. See if you compair all of the console gamers, to the PC gamers. The console gamers still outnumber us PC gamers. So sales and personal opinion alone dont make a game the best ever. Get out and play some of the better games that the PC has to offer, you will then understand what a good game is.

By: ntlgnce

ntlgnce — Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:48:24 +0000

Compairing Halo to a PC game is like compairing apples to rocks. I have Halo 1 and 2. It is nothing compaired to the PC games. And it has a long way to go before it gets anywhere close. You take the games sales and your personal opinion and use that to compair it to the games worth. In my opinion Halflife DOD game play is still better then Halo, ( a game that was made in 1995.) Dont get me wrong, Halo is by far the best game a console has to date. But you really need to take into consideration The number of gamers who own a console, Compaired to the number of gamers who own a PC, before you proclaim something like this.

By: mrwrestler

mrwrestler — Wed, 01 Sep 2010 02:31:03 +0000

@Jam Squad:
Halo ODST was the closest thing to “title-a-year” release and that was at almost 2 years exactly. Not to mention it started off as DLC for the game. No doubt elevated to the price of a full game by MS.

Look I understand if you hate Halo. But seriously get a new hobby. This article sucked anyways.

@Jared Carallo:
I found myself using many different weapons in Halo Reach because they all stood a fair chance and had their place. Much better than H3 where it was almost always a BR fight. That sh*t gets old quick.

By: Benin

Benin — Tue, 31 Aug 2010 07:21:52 +0000

The only thing that is bugging me about Halo Reach is the SUB HD visual quality. I know game play is the most important part of any game but “First Impression is Last Impression”.

By: jaywaxse

jaywaxse — Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:29:15 +0000

Great article, good points. Halo is definitely the most pure shooter I have ever played and continues to be extremely fun. Halo: Reach will be the spectacular finale to an already incredible series.

By: JubJub

JubJub — Mon, 30 Aug 2010 02:24:32 +0000

In reply to Fookin Prawn. Make it easy on yourself, Dutch....