Dude, what the heck? I know all about Legends brotha. I asked u that question about “scope” for a reason………..when people hear “open world rpg” they go nuts over it, because it sounds like there’ll be massive content to explore. Legends sounds different imo. It’s a mp game by nature. Way different than a classic rpg in design. C’mon my brotha. The question was simple.

Also, what does the old Fables, being limited in scope (non huge worlds) have to do with it being made for a new system (X1) that has like 16 times the available RAM on it, have to do with anything? I said “what a next gen Fable COULD be”. That means EXPANDING beyond previous versions, u know, like the Witcher 3. Aahh. Oh well. We just disagree here my man.

Umm FL is a next gen fable game it is for Xbox one and Windows 10 only. It is making use of Dx12, also none of the fables have had huge worlds they are not tes.

Do u think Legends will provide the scope of an open world rpg, that a next gen Fable could be? I guess we’d just answer this differently. So we differ here.

I like that its different then early games, also it is stated that if played single player that the other “heroes” are companions so in a sense it is like Dragon Age. One of the things I really hope they expand on is the ability to affect your surroundings by your choices as I loved that aspect. Also I don’t wanna be a mute dang hero…

Yeah I know Molyneux left (that’s why I said adios haha). Also, just because Legends has a story doesn’t make it like the original. The original first 3 followed one main character, who leveled up etc. This one follows 4 at a time, up against one villian controlling the enemies. It’s way didferent man. I am saying that Microsoft could bring us all the Fable we always wanted, and don’t think Legends will be it.

Molyneux is not apart of Fable:Legends and FL has single player which I am sure means there is a story to it.https://www.fablelegends.com/faq