Comments on: How Powerful Is PS4 Neo Really?

By: Hvd

Hvd — Sun, 19 Jun 2016 04:05:00 +0000

i think it will be a cut down version of the r9 380x which is what i have now but the real issue with the ps4 neo is the overclocked 3-4 yars old jaguar cpu with a new gpu.it will bottle neck like crazy.

thats like putting a gtx 970 with a fx 6300 in pc terms.bottleneck which means it will run poorly.

By: Purist

Purist — Thu, 16 Jun 2016 05:12:00 +0000

In reply to Onnawa.

the last time i got invested in a story in a game is something i cannot even remember. THe last of us, a bit… castlevania maybe… its strange to see these people happy and big gaming media house making money writing articles and ad like ign and gamespot. At the end none of the hype games are good to be honest. They have bad to decent reviews. not emotionally attachable story. U buy some games just because ur friends has them or u see them playing on friends list. the few good games are 20fps.

By: Purist

Purist — Thu, 16 Jun 2016 05:07:00 +0000

In reply to parrotcam. ya this was bad year for gaming. last couple of yrs i should say on consoles.

By: Kehool

Kehool — Sat, 28 May 2016 14:38:00 +0000

In reply to Squidgybo.

The game world has no real depth… the people walking around are just dumb mannequins, like in witcher 3 or AC unity and that is precisely what the author is talking about.

Also I can’t hear that “massive 8 GB of RAM” nonsense anymore.. that’s not massive, that’s just about enough for today’s games. Also that’s not the real issue at hand here, CPU power is and upgrading that is difficult since using a new CPU architecture would mean breaking backwards compatibility.

By: Kehool

Kehool — Sat, 28 May 2016 14:33:00 +0000

“AMD doesn’t have any desktop or mobile part shipping with 36 CUs.
There’s a 32 CU part—the R9 380X, a 38 CU part—the R9 290. At the higher
end, there are 64 CU parts—the Fury X and Fury Nano. But there’s no
current AMD GPU that features 36 CUs.”

AMD didn’t have a GPU with 18 CUs on offer either, and yet the PS4 had one anyway.

By: Squidgybo

Squidgybo — Sun, 22 May 2016 16:38:00 +0000

In reply to BB Scales. Silly comment. Uncharted games are linear levels. Linear levels allow for better graphics. There isn't a huge living breathing open will with a million things going on at once, so you have more resources to make better animations and better graphics. Big open world games like GTA have to cut back on graphics etc to allow for a big open world. All developers, Naughty Dog, Hideo Kojima and many other say that they have no idea how Rockstar North are able to make games like GTAV. It blows them away. GTAV is a technical marvel. How they made that game fit on 360 and PS3 that only have 512MB of Ram, i'll never know. It is bordering on wizardry.

By: BB Scales

BB Scales — Thu, 19 May 2016 01:43:00 +0000

In reply to Squidgybo. No need, Naughty Dog already showed everyone how it's done. Currenty the best animations and graphics on both PC and consoles. I doubt GTA6 will top it. GTA5 animations weren't as good as Last of Us and Uncharted 4's are borderline lifelike

By: Some Guy

Some Guy — Mon, 16 May 2016 01:30:00 +0000

In reply to JomJom. No, it isn't. Define theory.

By: JomJom

JomJom — Mon, 16 May 2016 00:43:00 +0000

In reply to Some Guy. It's ok, nobody blames you. I'm aware of what theory is, the word you're looking for is hypothesis. Cheers!

By: Some Guy

Some Guy — Sun, 15 May 2016 19:58:00 +0000

In reply to JomJom. It's not my fault if you don't understand the definition of the word 'theory'.