<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: id Software: &#8216;Extended console cycles are actually good for everyone&#8217;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gamingbolt.com/id-software-extended-console-cycles-are-actually-good-for-everyone/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gamingbolt.com/id-software-extended-console-cycles-are-actually-good-for-everyone</link>
	<description>Get a Bolt of Gaming Now!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 17:42:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: coldjeb		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/id-software-extended-console-cycles-are-actually-good-for-everyone#comment-92142</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[coldjeb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=39371#comment-92142</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Finally...some common sense about &quot;next gen&quot;.  

This gen is not over, and shouldn&#039;t even be considered to being close to being over.  Developers are still finding ways to optimize current hardware usage, still haven&#039;t fully taken advantage of HD gaming, still haven&#039;t solidified 3D gaming, still are developing an install base for alternate &quot;input&quot; etc.  

Hasn&#039;t console gaming always trailed PC gaming???  I was playing PC games online 10 years before I was playing on-line with my Sega Dreamcast!  Consoles have always taken a performance hit because of their dedicated / proprietary hardware that costs hundreds if not thousands of dollars less than what it costs to game on a decent PC.

Can we all just go back to enjoying what this gen has to offer?  Next gen will come, but change for change sake shouldn&#039;t be why we have to shell out for a new console.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally&#8230;some common sense about &#8220;next gen&#8221;.  </p>
<p>This gen is not over, and shouldn&#8217;t even be considered to being close to being over.  Developers are still finding ways to optimize current hardware usage, still haven&#8217;t fully taken advantage of HD gaming, still haven&#8217;t solidified 3D gaming, still are developing an install base for alternate &#8220;input&#8221; etc.  </p>
<p>Hasn&#8217;t console gaming always trailed PC gaming???  I was playing PC games online 10 years before I was playing on-line with my Sega Dreamcast!  Consoles have always taken a performance hit because of their dedicated / proprietary hardware that costs hundreds if not thousands of dollars less than what it costs to game on a decent PC.</p>
<p>Can we all just go back to enjoying what this gen has to offer?  Next gen will come, but change for change sake shouldn&#8217;t be why we have to shell out for a new console.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Zephol		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/id-software-extended-console-cycles-are-actually-good-for-everyone#comment-92138</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zephol]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 14:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=39371#comment-92138</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It has more than reasonable. Everyone always pay the price?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has more than reasonable. Everyone always pay the price?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
