<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Is Crash PS4&#8217;s Success Evidence That Microsoft Should Look Into Reviving Banjo Kazooie and Conker?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gamingbolt.com/is-crash-ps4s-success-evidence-that-microsoft-should-look-into-reviving-banjo-kazooie-and-conker/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gamingbolt.com/is-crash-ps4s-success-evidence-that-microsoft-should-look-into-reviving-banjo-kazooie-and-conker</link>
	<description>Get a Bolt of Gaming Now!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2017 10:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: TSR - Ule #TeamZeRo		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/is-crash-ps4s-success-evidence-that-microsoft-should-look-into-reviving-banjo-kazooie-and-conker#comment-337712</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TSR - Ule #TeamZeRo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2017 10:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=301607#comment-337712</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/is-crash-ps4s-success-evidence-that-microsoft-should-look-into-reviving-banjo-kazooie-and-conker#comment-335725&quot;&gt;kee1haul&lt;/a&gt;.

And that Smash bros for the Switch leak was 100% real too.

Don&#039;t take leaks way too seriously. Retailers can make mistakes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/is-crash-ps4s-success-evidence-that-microsoft-should-look-into-reviving-banjo-kazooie-and-conker#comment-335725">kee1haul</a>.</p>
<p>And that Smash bros for the Switch leak was 100% real too.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t take leaks way too seriously. Retailers can make mistakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: doplerradar		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/is-crash-ps4s-success-evidence-that-microsoft-should-look-into-reviving-banjo-kazooie-and-conker#comment-335769</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[doplerradar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 04:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=301607#comment-335769</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/is-crash-ps4s-success-evidence-that-microsoft-should-look-into-reviving-banjo-kazooie-and-conker#comment-335759&quot;&gt;isturbo1984&lt;/a&gt;.

Most likely wouldn&#039;t refer to PSNow. PS3 port isn&#039;t likely and Sony has practically abandoned Vita and Activision most likely wouldn&#039;t be interested in a port for it anyways. PC is a likely port but I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if it isn&#039;t the only system it is porting to.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/is-crash-ps4s-success-evidence-that-microsoft-should-look-into-reviving-banjo-kazooie-and-conker#comment-335759">isturbo1984</a>.</p>
<p>Most likely wouldn&#8217;t refer to PSNow. PS3 port isn&#8217;t likely and Sony has practically abandoned Vita and Activision most likely wouldn&#8217;t be interested in a port for it anyways. PC is a likely port but I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if it isn&#8217;t the only system it is porting to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: isturbo1984		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/is-crash-ps4s-success-evidence-that-microsoft-should-look-into-reviving-banjo-kazooie-and-conker#comment-335759</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[isturbo1984]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 04:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=301607#comment-335759</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/is-crash-ps4s-success-evidence-that-microsoft-should-look-into-reviving-banjo-kazooie-and-conker#comment-335748&quot;&gt;doplerradar&lt;/a&gt;.

PSNow. PS3? Vita? PC.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/is-crash-ps4s-success-evidence-that-microsoft-should-look-into-reviving-banjo-kazooie-and-conker#comment-335748">doplerradar</a>.</p>
<p>PSNow. PS3? Vita? PC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: doplerradar		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/is-crash-ps4s-success-evidence-that-microsoft-should-look-into-reviving-banjo-kazooie-and-conker#comment-335748</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[doplerradar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 01:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=301607#comment-335748</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/is-crash-ps4s-success-evidence-that-microsoft-should-look-into-reviving-banjo-kazooie-and-conker#comment-335745&quot;&gt;isturbo1984&lt;/a&gt;.

I just disagree with no offense to you. 

I think the decision for a remaster depends on who holds the current IP rights rather than who had it in the past. 

The way Sony phrased it is that Crash is coming &quot;to PS4 and PS4 Pro first&quot;. The &quot;first&quot; part makes it sound like it may not remain exclusive similar to titles that made it first to Xbox but PS later. Microsoft has used similar wording for timed exclusives. If it was permanent exclusive then Sony would have just said it was a lifetime exclusive similar to Titanfall and Cuphead when people suggested they will come to PS.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/is-crash-ps4s-success-evidence-that-microsoft-should-look-into-reviving-banjo-kazooie-and-conker#comment-335745">isturbo1984</a>.</p>
<p>I just disagree with no offense to you. </p>
<p>I think the decision for a remaster depends on who holds the current IP rights rather than who had it in the past. </p>
<p>The way Sony phrased it is that Crash is coming &#8220;to PS4 and PS4 Pro first&#8221;. The &#8220;first&#8221; part makes it sound like it may not remain exclusive similar to titles that made it first to Xbox but PS later. Microsoft has used similar wording for timed exclusives. If it was permanent exclusive then Sony would have just said it was a lifetime exclusive similar to Titanfall and Cuphead when people suggested they will come to PS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: isturbo1984		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/is-crash-ps4s-success-evidence-that-microsoft-should-look-into-reviving-banjo-kazooie-and-conker#comment-335745</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[isturbo1984]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 00:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=301607#comment-335745</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/is-crash-ps4s-success-evidence-that-microsoft-should-look-into-reviving-banjo-kazooie-and-conker#comment-335743&quot;&gt;doplerradar&lt;/a&gt;.

Or common sense. Just look it up. Sony owns exclusive rights over the original Crash games on the Ps1. The Insane trilogy only exists because of sony. Activision didnt have the rights to do it themselves, even with the Crash license.

Youre being weird. You were uneducated on the subject and I was educating you. Now you ignore everything I said and want to talk about who was originally right?? I didnt know this is what this was all about.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/is-crash-ps4s-success-evidence-that-microsoft-should-look-into-reviving-banjo-kazooie-and-conker#comment-335743">doplerradar</a>.</p>
<p>Or common sense. Just look it up. Sony owns exclusive rights over the original Crash games on the Ps1. The Insane trilogy only exists because of sony. Activision didnt have the rights to do it themselves, even with the Crash license.</p>
<p>Youre being weird. You were uneducated on the subject and I was educating you. Now you ignore everything I said and want to talk about who was originally right?? I didnt know this is what this was all about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: doplerradar		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/is-crash-ps4s-success-evidence-that-microsoft-should-look-into-reviving-banjo-kazooie-and-conker#comment-335743</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[doplerradar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2017 23:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=301607#comment-335743</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/is-crash-ps4s-success-evidence-that-microsoft-should-look-into-reviving-banjo-kazooie-and-conker#comment-335730&quot;&gt;isturbo1984&lt;/a&gt;.

I guess time will tell which one of us is right.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/is-crash-ps4s-success-evidence-that-microsoft-should-look-into-reviving-banjo-kazooie-and-conker#comment-335730">isturbo1984</a>.</p>
<p>I guess time will tell which one of us is right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Smart guy		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/is-crash-ps4s-success-evidence-that-microsoft-should-look-into-reviving-banjo-kazooie-and-conker#comment-335741</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smart guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2017 23:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=301607#comment-335741</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/is-crash-ps4s-success-evidence-that-microsoft-should-look-into-reviving-banjo-kazooie-and-conker#comment-335631&quot;&gt;isturbo1984&lt;/a&gt;.

You got a point there, and everyone hates b**chrat! I wouldn&#039;t want to be compared to that guy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/is-crash-ps4s-success-evidence-that-microsoft-should-look-into-reviving-banjo-kazooie-and-conker#comment-335631">isturbo1984</a>.</p>
<p>You got a point there, and everyone hates b**chrat! I wouldn&#8217;t want to be compared to that guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: isturbo1984		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/is-crash-ps4s-success-evidence-that-microsoft-should-look-into-reviving-banjo-kazooie-and-conker#comment-335731</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[isturbo1984]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2017 20:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=301607#comment-335731</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/is-crash-ps4s-success-evidence-that-microsoft-should-look-into-reviving-banjo-kazooie-and-conker#comment-335679&quot;&gt;kee1haul&lt;/a&gt;.

source? :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/is-crash-ps4s-success-evidence-that-microsoft-should-look-into-reviving-banjo-kazooie-and-conker#comment-335679">kee1haul</a>.</p>
<p>source? 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: isturbo1984		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/is-crash-ps4s-success-evidence-that-microsoft-should-look-into-reviving-banjo-kazooie-and-conker#comment-335730</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[isturbo1984]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2017 20:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=301607#comment-335730</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/is-crash-ps4s-success-evidence-that-microsoft-should-look-into-reviving-banjo-kazooie-and-conker#comment-335650&quot;&gt;doplerradar&lt;/a&gt;.

No. Thats the entire point of what i was saying. It does matter. If you own the IP, that just means you own the creative rights of the franchise and how to distribute new games. That does NOT give Activision free reign to use the license however you want, including infringing on other&#039;s ownership. Sony owns the ownership of thefirst three games specifically. In short, the only way for a remaster is if they both worked together in a collaboration. Sony needed Activision to sign off. Activision needed Sony to sign off. And this will only come to PlayStation, Like I said... there is a reason these games havent been ported or remade on other platforms.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/is-crash-ps4s-success-evidence-that-microsoft-should-look-into-reviving-banjo-kazooie-and-conker#comment-335650">doplerradar</a>.</p>
<p>No. Thats the entire point of what i was saying. It does matter. If you own the IP, that just means you own the creative rights of the franchise and how to distribute new games. That does NOT give Activision free reign to use the license however you want, including infringing on other&#8217;s ownership. Sony owns the ownership of thefirst three games specifically. In short, the only way for a remaster is if they both worked together in a collaboration. Sony needed Activision to sign off. Activision needed Sony to sign off. And this will only come to PlayStation, Like I said&#8230; there is a reason these games havent been ported or remade on other platforms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: kee1haul		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/is-crash-ps4s-success-evidence-that-microsoft-should-look-into-reviving-banjo-kazooie-and-conker#comment-335725</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kee1haul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2017 19:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=301607#comment-335725</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/is-crash-ps4s-success-evidence-that-microsoft-should-look-into-reviving-banjo-kazooie-and-conker#comment-335712&quot;&gt;HououinKyoma&lt;/a&gt;.

Neither Sony nor Activision have said exclusive.  It&#039;s already been leaked for December on Xbox.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/is-crash-ps4s-success-evidence-that-microsoft-should-look-into-reviving-banjo-kazooie-and-conker#comment-335712">HououinKyoma</a>.</p>
<p>Neither Sony nor Activision have said exclusive.  It&#8217;s already been leaked for December on Xbox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
