just as Gladys answered I cannot believe that a mom can make $8495 in four weeks on the computer . Learn More -> to know more click here right now!!! <-

I’ve been trying to avoid videos and any kind of spoilers so that it is all fresh when I start playing but I’ve been getting hyped over the past week. It’s been awhile since a new third person shooter game released (evil within comes to mind) and the order looks like it will scratch that itch.

Evil Within wasn’t bad but I’m looking forward to playing a game a little more fast paced and action based. I enjoy horror games but the slower pace and tension enduced from Evil Within made it difficult to enjoy at times.

I completely agree.

They tried something, and they shoul get credit for that.
And I’ve seen a bit of the game (there’s a bunch of copies around, and gameplay videos on YT), it seems to work pretty well.

Anyways, I’ll get my copy Day One, and I must admit I’m pretty hyped.

Yes. them maybe take ya girl out for a night. Oh wait you still a virgin right?! 🙂

I can live with that.

“it might turn out to be pretty good, but to be honest, I’m a little sceptical. And even if it works, they’re trying smething new, ”

I was thinking this the other day. Some people have been bashing Ready at Dawn due to the cinematic approach. Maybe it completely fails, maybe it turns out to be extremely innovative. My guess is some will love it, others will hate it, and there will be those that are indifferent but atleast RaD is trying something unique here.

A problem with this industry is that fans and critics are so contradictory. I’ll here people say graphics don’t matter. Yet a lot of the criticism for this game has to do with the widescreen aspect, the resolution (is it truly 1080p), and frame rate. Then I here people complain that videogames aren’t innovative enough, it’s all the same rehashed ideas. So Ready ar Dawn tries something a bit different and people rip it apart because “cinematics and games don’t belong together.”

I’m atleast glad to see a game coming out that does try to mix up the formula a bit. It is why I am intrigued by the game. If it fails then maybe it proves this idea isnt meant for games. If it succeeds then we will have a lot of companies taking new approaches to games. But at the very least we should give RaD credit for taking a chance.

Yes, I’m interested in how long the game is. When I talked about “this kind of information”, I was referring to the comment I initially replied to.

So, not really a contradiction here.

Perhaps a better example is Metro. I’m currently playing metro redux, right now 2033, and the game is only 6 chapters. That doesn’t sound very but each chapter will take atleast an hour each, typically longer. I don’t know if I can check game time but I have to be atleast 8 hours in as a near the end of chapter 4.

The thing with evil within is that chapter length could be determined by play style. I remember my friend having a longer play time but he died less than me because he played at a slower pace. I also recall parts that I would get stuck on for awhile due to lasck of ammo, proper upgrades, health, or just not knowing the proper strategy. That is a game that on a second playthrough would be closer to 10 hours but it took me 18-20 on my first play

You didn’t need to type all of that.