Not according to Digital Foundry.

Nope. It has an atmospheric simulator that renders the sky differently. All versions of Phantom Pain will have real time weather, whereas GZ has it set for each mission.

The bad thing is though when a game gets a lot of bad press about it for me it takes away the experience for the game as you start to lower your expectations for the game which is a shame.
As for my last comment I kind of came of a bit too positive. I want to get through that it is great game but it does have some problems like a few bad lines from miller and miller repeating the same stuff as you play the missions again (which in the phantom pain they said they would add a mute and I didn’t really notice it as I was concentrated on not getting caught but some people did) and as it said in the article “the anti-aliasing is noticeably low-grade. Environmental destruction is limited, and some buildings look all too familiar at times”. But if you take way all those little things away MGS ground zeros delivered on what it was meant to which was giving you a little back story which they will expand on in the phantom pain and getting excited for the main game. For me it was a success in my eyes as it achieved that and even the reviewers that rated it badly said it made them excited, so did people forgot that they was buying a prologue or something because it seems stupid to judge this game as a full game because it’s not.

But as I said before I still would of preferred to have had this with main game but it’s for the benefit of the main game that they didn’t as they have seen the comments about the bad points and trying to improve/get rid of them in the phantom pain but then some people will still say it should have been free.

Maybe even if they had more time with phantom pain Ground Zeros could have been a little bit longer but from a prologue perspective it could not be that much bigger as you want to keep the story for the main game and as you have targeted this game at your fans you don’t want to waste there time on revision on the character you already know by playing the other games multiple times. Sure they could of done more like making that cutscene after you finish the game in to a mission where you truly have to fight for everything you have and know that you can’t win which maybe would of made you have more of a reason to believe why he turns. Also maybe making the game like ‘vantage point’ giving a cutscene of someone else’s perspective like Paz or even playing from someone else’s perspective knowing that you can not do nothing as you play as Paz or Chico knowing that the same ending is coming (maybe even throw in a paradox in there) making you feel even worse for Chico. Thus making you even more enraged about skull faces actions.

that’s why its better to wait till enough games come out and wait for a price drop before buying a next new gen console. Most people I know are still happy with there ps3 so why buy a ps4 there no point yet,

I bought ground zeroes and I think it’s one of the best games out there and definitely had me pumped for phantom pain.

Pretty sure the butthurt is all coming from your end, dude.
Enjoy those inferior multiplats 🙂

Lemme guess, you got the xbox one version? lmfao silly xbot.
Your butthurt is showing 😉

yeah but with most major games having delays theres not enough on the new consoles to keep you busy

I totally agree with you – I personally don’t think there is anything wrong with MGS5:GZ yet, although people are entitled to their opinion. I completed the first main mission yesterday and the end credits came up. I didn’t have the same reaction as others. And anyone who has played the game will know its not small. The issue a reviewer had hilighted in an article I had read was the end credits came rolling after you complete the first mission. Had the end credits not been placed there and the game rolled into the next unlocked mission, people would sing a different tune to the size of the game.