<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Modern Warfare 3 vs Modern Warfare 2: Weapons And Environments Comparison	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gamingbolt.com/modern-warfare-3-vs-modern-warfare-2-weapons-and-environments-comparison/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gamingbolt.com/modern-warfare-3-vs-modern-warfare-2-weapons-and-environments-comparison</link>
	<description>Get a Bolt of Gaming Now!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 07:28:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Speakindatruth		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/modern-warfare-3-vs-modern-warfare-2-weapons-and-environments-comparison#comment-78127</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Speakindatruth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 20:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=30400#comment-78127</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Luke, does it matter? BF3 is going to be great, there&#039;s no doubt--but will it run well on consoles?
I mean, it may run on dev consoles--which are the same thing but run slightly better--but trailer and gameplay footage is going to be much different from actual, in-home gameplay. Look at Crysis 2, you know what I mean? Great graphics, runs terribly because the console can&#039;t handle it. BF3&#039;s going to either do the same thing, or lower texture qualities, add texture streaming, and lower overall delivery to something like 720P (much like MoH). I&#039;m not saying anything&#039;s bad about the overall build quality of the game, but I don&#039;t think it&#039;ll hold up to expectations on consoles, much like games such as Brink and Crysis 2 have shown us. We need a new console.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luke, does it matter? BF3 is going to be great, there&#8217;s no doubt&#8211;but will it run well on consoles?<br />
I mean, it may run on dev consoles&#8211;which are the same thing but run slightly better&#8211;but trailer and gameplay footage is going to be much different from actual, in-home gameplay. Look at Crysis 2, you know what I mean? Great graphics, runs terribly because the console can&#8217;t handle it. BF3&#8217;s going to either do the same thing, or lower texture qualities, add texture streaming, and lower overall delivery to something like 720P (much like MoH). I&#8217;m not saying anything&#8217;s bad about the overall build quality of the game, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;ll hold up to expectations on consoles, much like games such as Brink and Crysis 2 have shown us. We need a new console.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Luke		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/modern-warfare-3-vs-modern-warfare-2-weapons-and-environments-comparison#comment-78125</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 20:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=30400#comment-78125</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;As if you needed any more reasons to get excited about the next Call of Duty.&quot;

So far, i have no reason to be excited for the next Call of Duty.  Because at the same time, Battlefield 3 is bringing more to the table than a better scope reflection.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As if you needed any more reasons to get excited about the next Call of Duty.&#8221;</p>
<p>So far, i have no reason to be excited for the next Call of Duty.  Because at the same time, Battlefield 3 is bringing more to the table than a better scope reflection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
