Comments on: Paradox on King Arthur II’s performance complaints- “If it gets below 20 FPS, then it is bad performance”

By: charles2029

charles2029 — Sat, 24 Mar 2012 00:50:34 +0000

Really? that’s how they’re going to defend their game, by saying below 20 fps is performance? I think their arguments are a little outdated by today’s tech standards.

By: Kartik Mudgal

Kartik Mudgal — Wed, 01 Feb 2012 05:57:48 +0000

In reply to Echoblade. Thank you.

By: Echoblade

Echoblade — Wed, 01 Feb 2012 03:21:21 +0000

Guys, you may want to edit the article to neocore games (http://www.neocoregames.com/) instead of paradox. Paradox merely published the game while Neocore developed and said those comments. I do agree on the fact that they are talking nonsense when it comes down to 24fps over 60 or even 30 fps.

By: Shubhankar Parijat

Shubhankar Parijat — Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:27:50 +0000

In reply to Mr.Buzzkill. The post also linked to a 60 FPS vs 24 FPS video at the end (it's a non-YouTube video).

By: Mr.Buzzkill

Mr.Buzzkill — Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:57:58 +0000

Youtube converts anything above 30 fps back to 30. That video is literally just showing the difference between 24 and 30.

Sincerely, Mr. Buzzkill.