You seem like a huge Sony fanboy. I happen to own both the PS4 and Xbox One and see almost no performance gap at all between the two. In fact for me the Xbox One runs games slightly smoother with its better FPS in games and more vibrant colors. Also so you understand resolution is not graphics. To prove this look at Minecraft on the Xbox One, it runs at 1080p. Now look at Battlefield Hardline on the Xbox One, it runs at 720p. Which one looks better? I would have to argue that Battlefield Hardline does. It’s also funny how that %50 gain in performance the PS4 apparently has, is very insignificant and can’t be noticed unless you go up to the screen and count the individual pixels.

Put Away the lsd man you could never be any more wrong than this whole paragraph.! AMD Knew about Dx12 and DX 9,10,11, now 12 have been. Were made to get rid of mantle Opengl just recently it has made a comeback (Mantle) (OpenGl). But believe One thing 3 billion dollars Ms wouldn’t throw away for nothing. We’l see cause everyone is being really Quiet and its just the 1st year out the gate!!

And AMD lied because the POS4 GPU has less CU’s and ROP’s than the 7950 which they released a year earlier

Which is why you have a weak, garbage barely reaching 30FPS console with no secret sauce and no support for technologies like GPGPU, HSA and hUMA which will be EXCLUSIVELY on PC

“Handful”

So basically all of the AMD 7000/R200 series and Nvidia as far back as the 5000 series which is most of the market

Mark Cerny is a liar and a hack who sold underpowered hardware to morons like you. Mantle was in development well before the PS4 as well, idiot. And the 7850 the PS4 is based of was on sale back in 2012.

Face facts loser. You have a garbage tablet APU in your garbage console.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You really think that garbage is good? Peasantstation gamers are blind, confirmed.

800P lol

Just because the xbone is garbage doesn’t excuse the POS4 from being garbage too :^)

I swear you’re a crack baby. OMG. >_<

FACTUALLY 1366×768 ISN'T 16.9 aspect ratio but is considered as such because the horizontal width is off only about 0.05%! No one cares about that 0.05% difference so its categorized as 16:9! I clearly stated that the res in question IS NOT REALLY 720p but IS REGARDED AS SUCH! Same philosophy applies here. And aspect ratio got nothing to do with an image being progressive or not! So to say, "1366×768 is a 16:9 Aspect Ratio Resolution. So to call it 768p is FACTUALLY CORRECT," is factually incorrect! You fraud! Yup I'm finished here too. end discussion.

Your a moron. Seriously.

1366×768 is a 16:9 Aspect Ratio Resolution.
So to call it 768p is FACTUALLY CORRECT.
Anyone who calls 1366×768 720p is PLAIN WRONG.

Like I said: Have a read up on COMPUTER DISPLAY STANDARDS.

There is nothing left to say on this matter.