We have an Xbox fanboy here folks.

But 50% more powerful on paper does not relate to 50% real world performance in games. Last gen proved that the ps3 was more powerful than the x360.

post processing requires same frame being reworked a few times. seperately for each effect we want to put on top – bloom, AA, light, fog, deferred shading and so on. For that esram is too small:

http://www.gamespot.com/articles/why-do-more-ps4-games-run-in-1080p-than-xbox-one-sniper-elite-dev-explains/1100-6417628/

http://wccftech.com/outlast-dev-xbox-esram-small-1080p-game-runs-full-hd-resolution-occasional-frame-drops/

http://gamingbolt.com/xbox-one-esram-easy-to-use-but-its-limited-size-deciding-what-should-go-there-are-an-issue-dev

http://www.bidnessetc.com/48631-is-directx-12-a-game-changer-for-xbox-one-or-simply-a-technical-slideshow/

And in general, in the end this doesn’t really matter – games on xbox one are as enjoyable as those games at ps4. Difference is hard to spot, or you’d have to have two systems side by side to see it. But from technical point of view xbox one is simply bit weaker – eSram surely helps, but at the same time the gap doesn’t go anywhere. And that was the only thing I was addressing.

sorry, should be: is not connected, according to the diagram.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-vs-the-xbox-one-architects
Idiot, read up. The “move engines” are special purpose processors, the SHAPE audio chip is more advanced than the standard AMD trueaudio chip the PS4 has etc.
Go check out extremetech too, lots more there.
Idiot.

That is not true if QB can run 1080p any game can.

Dumbass:

“ESRAM doesn’t help. ESRAM is connected to GPU.”

I allready said that above! Can you read? No you can`t, obviously.

Don`t tell me things i said nearly 10 hours ago before you!
Btw, just a PRO-tip for you:

You doN`t need a cpu-dependency to get a BETTER performance out of eSRAM.

Xbox One isn`t the one which is bandwidth starved. PS4 is.

So i tell you how it works in Xbox One:

Xbox One does its front/graphicsbutter via eSRAM.

That is fast (190 Gbyte/s).

So- graphics simply go there. And they go FASTER than on PS4 in average.

The cpu-data however goes from the cpu- to the DDR3-ram and back.

So you see? No magic. Just logic.

Thats why a PC does use the same architecture.

There is no stupid GDDR5 which feeds the cpu.

The cpu in modern day PCs wants DDR3/DDR4-ram NOT gdddr-ram 😉

AND: The Xbox One thus has no bandwidth-starving like PS4 has it.

Thats why you don`t need to cut graphics-effects on Xbox One-games like they do for PS4.

Btw, idiot:

“In xbox one bandwidth between CPU and RAM is limited to 20GB/s as this is max speed of communication with north bridge.”

And why does your image show TWO busses with 20 GB/s each? Are you dumb?

The PS4 is not the Xbox One.

And your above image shows that Xbox One has even 40 Gbyte/s bandwidth, idiot.

Man. Don`t talk about things if you have no single clue what you talk about. Have a nice day my friend. And don`t forget: More games which will crash down like Until Dawn/The Order/Thief 4/Tetris/ or Witcher 3 will follow.

Oh another thing though: AMD Jaguar does only support 30 Gbyte/s bandwidth. Because its a tablett-cpu, not a PC-model. AMD said that. So this means, even if Xbox one has 40 Gbyte/s, it can only use 30, the rest is not usable/gone.

“path 1.8 makes possible to turn off post-processing which fixes ps4 problems -”

That is stupid. So they are further downgrading the game? Wow…lame…there you see what crazy hardware PS4 uses…crap.

ESRAM is not a problem. It’s great for frame buffer and posprocessing. Problem is, it’s too small for full HD, and no dx12 can fix it. But surelly thanks to it xbox keeps up.