For gaming, 20ms response time is horrible, let alone great. Taking PC monitors as an example, depending on model & make, you want no more than 8ms unless you want to experience ghosting. The phasing out of Plasma T.V.’s is a damn shame, considering they have the best response time only second to CRT monitors and T.V.’s, which ironically have the best response times. The LCD/LED 120hz/240hz etc. was nothing but market speech buzzwords and many lapped it up.

Down-sampling the “old-school” manual way in PC gaming has been around for years. Now, you have Nvidia’s DSR and AMD VSR which is a built-in feature to the control panel options for a more user friendly, quick access experience. I’m not familiar with AMD VSR but Nvidia’s DSR even has a sharpen & smoother slider option, the former gives a sharper image albeit with potentially more jaggies and the latter smooth option the opposite, less jaggies but a softer image. Yeah, downsampling as you’d expect puts a lot more load on the GPU depending on what resolution you’re DSing from, just like if you were to play at a higher resolution natively.

Blah, blah, blah, nonsense! Just more typical garbage being spewed by your hating a$$

Make sense, moron. You salty bots

“and any 4K tv set under 50″ isn’t worth the cost.
Unless your 2ft away from it.”
Pretty much. You would have to sit about 3-4′ from a “40 4K screen to notice the extra detail.
The human eye cannot discern the difference between 720p, 1080p, 1440p and 2160p (4K) depending on the viewing distance.
Here are two excellent sites with charts –
1.) http://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/by-size/size-to-distance-relationship
2.) http://www.crutchfield.com/S-jwX6oskR7O0/learn/learningcenter/home/TV_placement.html

As the old saying goes “You get what you pay for”. Trust me, I may not be into A/V scene like I once used to be back in the day, researching all of the latest and greatest home theater tech. but I do know for a fact that when it comes to electronics, that saying above has been proven to be 100% true from my personal experience.

You have rare exceptions here and there, when you get a really good product for an excellent price. Over the years I’ve become more interested in PC technology and gaming, especially when I realized that I didn’t need to spend $1-2K in order to get an excellent all-around T.V. when I could spend a 1/3 of that and buy a PC monitor that gave me the same IQ for under $500 (Pixel density on a smaller monitor alone makes a huge difference).

Taking into consideration the last T.V. I purchased was $2,200 back when Pioneer was the king of plasma with their Kuro line (Kuro means ‘black’ in Japanese. which if you didn’t know, black levels are one of the most important aspects to IQ).They don’t make em like that anymore unless you’re willing to go OLED, which atm is still outrageously priced IMO. There are some excellent screens out there, and prices have significantly dropped over the years but I cannot see how a $400 4K t.v. is going to actually offer quality. It sounds too good to be true.

Actually its been in since gcn1.2

http://www.anandtech.com/show/8460/amd-radeon-r9-285-review/3

Go cry yourself to sleep

Of course it does lmao. DCC been in AMD chips since the 290 dumb dumb. It’s not something Sony has put in it’s just there. Xbox one doesn’t the S does because it’s polaris. So maybe you should stop spreading lies

vizio tv are better then those…lol

former for a reason.now trying to kiss as*…lmao