yeah, the only problem with all this “anti-used game” stuff is that, for gamers, it really ruins the idea of going back to play games that aren’t in print anymore. They’re not really “losing” money, they’re not getting back their investments for games that don’t do well. It’s like saying “Oh, this game did really crappy, but if you want to see it for yourself, you have to support them for making a crappy game by paying the full amount, therefore, they don’t think anything is wrong and they keep doing the same thing.” Instead of anyone being exposed to the game, people will instead rely solely on reviewers to tell them if it’s good or not, because no one wants to go spend $60 on something that they aren’t sure it’s going to be good, no one wants to buy a $60 piece of crap. It’s like letting your friend borrow an old cd, but before your friend can listen to it, they need to pay the full price for the cd, so they pay $15 but it turns out they hate that type of music. Now your friend is out $15, you look like a douche, and the company slips his money in their pockets, sounds good?