So it’s like I said your only argument is FPS (Frames Per Second) which = performance related. Which also means due to what I said about resolution that until PS4 starts making games so intensive that it itself is forced to go down to 720p it really won’t matter to Xbox1 users whatsoever. Also I hope you know Microsoft has servers capable of taking some of the performance load off of the console for games that are played online.

Personally I dream of the day future consoles cease being made unless it’s a generic P.C./Console hybrid that plays all games made at that point in time and with any luck will use a 3rd party O.S. that’s free just like how we have Linux O.S. out there right now which sadly have very little support with gaming companies. Anyways I can dream can’t I. Also I see no need in the distance future (basically when I’m old and grey) for console wars to keep existing since by then the time invested to make even a single game (graphic intensive) wouldn’t really give any good incentive for game maker company’s to be forced into only one platform due to budget costs to produce just that one title. They would want to reach as big of an audience as possible. (Yes I’m a P.C. finatic over console anyday if that isn’t obvious yet.) The only games I prefer playing on console are more co-op oriented and non FPS (first person shooter in this case). Heck thanks to something observed known as “Moore’s law” even if consoles still exist in the distant future give it 2 years tops and P.C.’s will be able to run a simulator of that console anyways since the performance increases will be huge by then per every 2 years.

I do own the Xbox1 over the PS4 for this current Gen but in the past I have owned a PS3/Wii/N64/NES as far as consoles go for me. I choose the Xbox1 over the PS4 for other reasons that have nothing to do with performance since their both current consoles with mild performance differences. Anyways until the future I dream of hopefully occurs we will continue having fanboys like you arguing over slight differences in performance that won’t make a huge deal especially since a new console always keeps coming out roughly 8 years apart. As far as things go in the meantime it’s not like were comparing a console to a previous gen here.

To wrap things up people need to choose based on “Why” they want what they do based on controller preference(including things like kinect/Eye Camera)/software functions/performance(if it’s a big deal to them even if it’s a mild difference)/exclusive game titles/etc…

Seriously what you ARE getting is 1080 gaming all the time as opposed to 720-900p most of the time. A fancy entertainment system that cannot sustain 1080p as a next Gen console would be a great deal for $250 bucks. At its current price it is a ripoff considering the alternative. Sorry if the truth hurts buddy.

Oh and that’s another thing… The PS4 doesn’t play all its games at 1080P… In fact, about a third of them are running at lower resolution than 1080P but, you’ve got 50% more transistors so, that doesn’t matter!

Seriously? You’re not getting 50% Faster GPU… This has been done to death! You’re getting about a 15% improvement in real world benchmarks using the PC Hardware. So, lets talk about who the fool was that thought 50% more transistors actually meant 50% more performance.

Here’s another example… The P4 had way more transistors than the P3 and yet, the Core 2 series went back to the P3 design for the core because it was simply more efficient.

Now, as any PC gamer can tell you, you’re better off with lower resolution and higher quality textures as well as better AA than you are at lower quality textures and higher resolution. This has been shown in several games where the lower resolution XO game actually looked better than the PS4 versions.

Also, many reviewers noted that the PS4 version of COD AW didn’t run as smoothly as the XO.

Sorry but, resolution that sacrifices frame rate or image quality isn’t a very good trade off.

And until we see the sales numbers from Q4 (Via Sony and Microsoft) every source out there is just speculating and some of them ridiculously inaccurate (VGCHARTZ) according to official sources.

Don’t you get it, it is financial jargon that does not guarantee sold to consumers. It is just how they’re reporting the info but, they don’t really know what’s sold through because not every company reports back to them unless their product isn’t selling at all.

Reality is yes, they’re likely about 3 Million units apart based on Financial Reports from Q3.

You’re right, just what was reported on their financial reports from September which was something like 10.5 Million Shipped.

Sony’s claims 13.5 Million Sold Through… The Problem is, Sold Through doesn’t actually have to mean Sold to Consumers as we learned from Steve Jobs when he altered Apple’s reporting.

Sold Through could very well mean you’re reporting shipments into the channel as being sold because you anticipate they will never return to your warehouse inventory.

So, the truth is Sony is likely somewhere around 14 Million now and Microsoft around 11 Million but, both are killing it over previous generations of consoles.

Well, XO needed to “popularize” itself… The things it needed fixing were mostly PR related… And it remedied those swimmingly! You’re right about content (or the lack there-of) though.

Same goes for Microsoft there’s no statement regarding 10million sold through consumers.

And 11 shipped does not mean 10million sold lol. So you’re saying Sony worldwide lead is down to 3 milion ?.

Look at the clear differences in GPU processing power between both consoles running GTA V (search YouTube). Seems like the XO is missing a lot of textures as a result of this “lack of hardware power”. Hardware limits MATTER, and will only get worse as the years go on and games mature for both systems.