<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: PS4 Will See Fewer 3rd Party Exclusives Due To Economic Conditions: Michael Pachter	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gamingbolt.com/ps4-will-see-fewer-3rd-party-exclusives-due-to-economic-conditions-michael-pachter/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gamingbolt.com/ps4-will-see-fewer-3rd-party-exclusives-due-to-economic-conditions-michael-pachter</link>
	<description>Get a Bolt of Gaming Now!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 19:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: SirCrush		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/ps4-will-see-fewer-3rd-party-exclusives-due-to-economic-conditions-michael-pachter#comment-186861</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SirCrush]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 19:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=138913#comment-186861</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It makes sense. I am, frankly, surprised that Sony was able to keep MANY of their third party studios exclusive...Naughty Dog, Insomniac, Guerrilla...hell I had just assumed that Sony owned these developers. If they don&#039;t, I&#039;d be interested to see what their contract structure looks like. Sure, the 3rd party exclusives are BOUND to shrink in number. They have every generation  (alllllll the way back to the Atari days) so it&#039;s not a huge gamble making that statement anyways lol I would venture to say that the quality of those exclusives has increased immensely compared to the vast majority of multi-platform games though so even those &quot;big 3&quot; keeping to the Sony side could still be a huge advantage in the long run.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes sense. I am, frankly, surprised that Sony was able to keep MANY of their third party studios exclusive&#8230;Naughty Dog, Insomniac, Guerrilla&#8230;hell I had just assumed that Sony owned these developers. If they don&#8217;t, I&#8217;d be interested to see what their contract structure looks like. Sure, the 3rd party exclusives are BOUND to shrink in number. They have every generation  (alllllll the way back to the Atari days) so it&#8217;s not a huge gamble making that statement anyways lol I would venture to say that the quality of those exclusives has increased immensely compared to the vast majority of multi-platform games though so even those &#8220;big 3&#8221; keeping to the Sony side could still be a huge advantage in the long run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
