Hmm yeah right. Ok.

Dont know if you know owt about statistics but the people blathering away would not be a representive sample of gamers skewed severely is what im thinking within 2 standard deviations my outlook would be prevalent and stands.you do understand I have both consoles?

Irrelevant to you but not most gamers clearly shown by articles and sales from hardware/software. IF Xbone could output the same res- as PS4 in the above games in question it wouldn’t be running as it is at 900p. ( that’s the point ).

PS4 could drop res if devs wanted- but Xbone can’t go up res at it would suffer/

This is irrelevant the xbox one version at 900p looks just as good and performance is better games like wolfenstein scale resolution relative to load the result is better performance which is what matters. I have both consoles I’d assumed ps4 for multiplat and xbox one for exclusives but I’m going to have to start perusing comparison reviews because a minority of games perform better on xbox.

sony does well to push developers to 1080p if users think like this guy here . Better are the 1080p or a stable framerate ? To say that a console is better than the other is absurd , if it were that one runs the games at 60fps and the other only 30 for example ok. Although it is only marketing material for the fanboys

Games on the X1 sometimes have higher framerates because the developers don’t feel pressured to reach 1080p. If you dropped the resolution on the ps4 the same way, you’d be at a higher framerate too.

Don’t believe it because RGT says so, believe it because it makes sense and no one is disputing it. Can you point at an analysis that says that DDR3 has especially short latency? I don’t think so.

Actually, DDR3 isn’t worse. It’s actually very nearly the same chips — just connected via a bus rather than a point to point connection. The latency is the same, but the bandwidth is slower, so I really don’t see an upside other than it being cheaper.

If you want to talk about low latency on the X1, look at the ESRAM. It’s tiny, but it’s inside of the APU. The latency on the ESRAM is probably nearly zero.

And what if I said Red Gaming Tech is wrong! Anyone can publish any article on the internet and have no clue on what they are talking about.
But you’re not taking the systems as a whole. The fact that you say DDR3 is worse is what I’m challenging you on.

You have to understand that a CAS rating is more akin to an engine timing than it is to a measure of speed. You’re not going to say that a Ford Escort is faster than a Ferrari because the Ferrari’s engine is generally at a higher RPM, and therefore uses more cycles, right?

Red Gaming Tech explains it better than I can, here:

http://www.redgamingtech.com/ps4-vs-xbox-one-gddr5-vs-ddr3-latency/

“The latency on GDDR5 and DDR3 memory does vary some, but the typical CAS latency of most sticks of DDR3 is between 7 and 9 (see the earlier Tomshardware link for more information). GDDR5 RAM meanwhile is a typical latency of about 15. Once again, all of this depends on the make and models of the RAM.

So – there’s the answer right? Let’s say 8 CAS vs 15 CAS? No, it’s not. We have to remember that the speeds are for all intents and purposes – relative. If you take the CAS of both, and then multiply it by the clock speed – you get the ns of delay. CAS of 15/1.35 = 11ns.”

Get it? We don’t have exact specs for either the X1 or the PS4, but the two memory types in general have exactly the same latency which is 11ns.