Comments on: Star Citizen Developer: More Features Mean More Developers

By: jim jim

jim jim — Fri, 13 Dec 2013 06:58:00 +0000

In reply to Pramath Parijat. Good responses mate, very professional acknowledgement :)

By: Pramath Parijat

Pramath Parijat — Fri, 13 Dec 2013 02:55:00 +0000

In reply to Tinnueth. As I have stated below multiple times, I made a mistake. I shouldn't have, I should have been more careful. I apologize, and I pledge to never let this happen again.

By: Pramath Parijat

Pramath Parijat — Fri, 13 Dec 2013 02:54:00 +0000

In reply to Ken. I do want to point out I am looking forward to the game a lot, and that I have no agenda against the game at all. I did not invent any facts, I had genuine errors. We all make them some times, and yes, mine happened to be more serious, and I should be held accountable for them. I have already accepted I made the errors, and I have apologized. I do not want to tamper with the original story, not because I want to convey the wrong message, but because I believe in editorial accountability- I goofed up, and I think it should be out there for all to see, unchanged. Editing the original story would be dishonest, and that is the only reason I have not changed the tone. Once again, I want to apologize for the original story. It was bad form on my part, and I wish it had not happened. But it did, and all I can do is pledge to ensure that it won't happen again, which I have. I do hope you can understand and respect all of this.

By: Tinnueth

Tinnueth — Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:42:00 +0000

It is a while since the last time I have read so much bullshit in one text.
Pramath, are you unwilling or incapable to inform yourself properly before writing an article?

By: HeinMueck

HeinMueck — Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:54:00 +0000

In reply to ishtmail. How about to write a REAL article about SC (research, summarize and finally rate it) or isnt this what you are supposed to do, to keep your readers updates and informed?

By: Ken

Ken — Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:16:00 +0000

So you may have changed all the facts you invented, yet the story you wanted to convey is the exact same. You’d think after losing the majority of your facts, that you’d have to reassess your viewpoint. But you didn’t. It’s obvious you had your mind made up about Star Citizen from the beginning, and you were going to write anything possible to support your claim.
Bet you’re loving all these hits.

By: Ricardo Guerra

Ricardo Guerra — Wed, 11 Dec 2013 08:43:00 +0000

Next time I would suggest your research to be done properly, since the article is very close to a slander. Cloud Imperium Games and Cris Roberts have been 100% fortright with the SC community, and is following the time table very closely, and so far there has been no delay in the game development. As for calling the game vaporware, you should remind yourself that Cris Roberts has a reputation, a real one where the game community trusts him and his word, unlike some media that will just blabber whatever comes to mind without the responsibility to do the work of a proper journalist. Last but now least, the Star Citizen community is over 300 thousand people, and we have invested over 34 million dollars. Do you
honestly think we would do such a thing if we didn’t believe in CIG and in Cris Robert’s view for the game? Articles such as this do not damage the target of your misplaced opinions, only your reputation as a writer and journalist.

By: GamingBolt

GamingBolt — Wed, 11 Dec 2013 04:59:00 +0000

In reply to six sigma. Absolutely. Again our apologies for that mistake.

By: six sigma

six sigma — Wed, 11 Dec 2013 02:34:00 +0000

In reply to GamingBolt. you might want to give your writers a bit of a strong message. We're not dumb! We DO get irritated really fast ! We dont need politics into the gaming spheres and tell your idiot writers to keep it out and stick to facts

By: six sigma

six sigma — Wed, 11 Dec 2013 02:32:00 +0000

no one is frustrated ..and Im the 147th backer of SC – these articles are more vaporware with their unsubstantiated insinuations!!