<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Benchmark &#8211; Video Game News, Reviews, Walkthroughs And Guides | GamingBolt</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gamingbolt.com/tag/benchmark/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gamingbolt.com</link>
	<description>Get a Bolt of Gaming Now!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 17:25:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>New DX12 Benchmark: 1300% Better Than DirectX 11</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/new-dx12-benchmark-1300-better-than-directx-11</link>
					<comments>https://gamingbolt.com/new-dx12-benchmark-1300-better-than-directx-11#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Toney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 17:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DX12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 10]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=226942</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is some serious performance gains.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://gamingbolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/dx12.jpg"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-202083" src="https://gamingbolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/dx12.jpg" alt="dx12" width="620" height="332" srcset="https://gamingbolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/dx12.jpg 620w, https://gamingbolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/dx12-300x160.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 620px) 100vw, 620px" /></a></p>
<p>DirectX 12. Get used to seeing that splashed everywhere in the coming months, because if the reports are to be believed, it&#8217;s going to have a massive impact for PC games development. 3DMark, the extremely popular cross platform benchmark, released  DX12 Vs DX11 Vs Mantle benchmarking software. PC World then picked it up and ran with it. The final results were far better than what many had predicted.</p>
<p>During their tests, PC World found that the AMD R9 290X saw a speed of 1300% in 3DMark&#8217;s API test, with Mantle scoring 1200% over the DX11 API test score. The DX12 API score however, takes the lead by a considerable margin. PC World also went ahead and swapped out the R9 290X for Nvidia&#8217;s beefy GTX Titan X and found that the two ran almost identically, despite Nvidia&#8217;s GTX Titan X costing nearly three times as much as the R9.</p>
<p>Intel&#8217;s Iris Pro Integrated GPU saw a boost in performance of X4 and the test revealed that Intel&#8217;s Quad Core CPUs (with Hyper Threading on) gave the fastest performance, with a noticeable difference in the DX12 Multi Threaded tests. Obviously, this is all fantastic stuff. But this is a benchmark, real world results are likely to vary from machine to machine. But all said, this is good news.</p>

<a href='https://gamingbolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/DX12-Benchmark-2.jpg'><img decoding="async" width="1160" height="697" src="https://gamingbolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/DX12-Benchmark-2.jpg" class="attachment-full size-full" alt="DX12 Benchmark AMD" srcset="https://gamingbolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/DX12-Benchmark-2.jpg 1160w, https://gamingbolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/DX12-Benchmark-2-300x180.jpg 300w, https://gamingbolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/DX12-Benchmark-2-1024x615.jpg 1024w" sizes="(max-width: 1160px) 100vw, 1160px" /></a>
<a href='https://gamingbolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/DX12-Benchmark.jpg'><img decoding="async" width="1160" height="697" src="https://gamingbolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/DX12-Benchmark.jpg" class="attachment-full size-full" alt="DX12 Benchmark Nvidia" srcset="https://gamingbolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/DX12-Benchmark.jpg 1160w, https://gamingbolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/DX12-Benchmark-300x180.jpg 300w, https://gamingbolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/DX12-Benchmark-1024x615.jpg 1024w" sizes="(max-width: 1160px) 100vw, 1160px" /></a>

<p>[<a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/2900814/tested-directx-12s-potential-performance-leap-is-insane.html" target="_blank">Source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gamingbolt.com/new-dx12-benchmark-1300-better-than-directx-11/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">226942</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ouya is a generation old according to benchmarks</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/ouya-is-a-generation-old-according-to-benchmarks</link>
					<comments>https://gamingbolt.com/ouya-is-a-generation-old-according-to-benchmarks#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kartik Mudgal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 08:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ouya]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=150426</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The system runs on Tegra 3 chip.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://gamingbolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/OUYA.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter  wp-image-143281" alt="OUYA" src="https://gamingbolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/OUYA-1024x576.jpg" width="505" srcset="https://gamingbolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/OUYA-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https://gamingbolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/OUYA-300x168.jpg 300w, https://gamingbolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/OUYA.jpg 1280w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></a></p>
<p>Ouya may cost $99 and may perform in line with other Tegra 3 devices but it&#8217;s extremely outdated when you compare it with other Android devices. The console is said to be a generation old than what we have today.</p>
<p>It ranks 73 in the Android power league table, when benchmarked with Futuremark and is ahead of Google&#8217;s Nexus 7 but does not match LG&#8217;s Nexus 4 smartphone.</p>
<p>Galaxy S IV absolutely destroys it. There&#8217;s a massive price difference but considering the Ouya doesn&#8217;t come with a screen or camera&#8211;which are some of the expensive parts of a smartphone&#8211;the comparison seems valid somewhat but it does perform as advertised and is based on a Tegra 3 chip.</p>
<p>We have a video which shows the results of Ouya against various devices. These are dev kit models of the console.</p>
<p>According to the description in the video: &#8221; The score here should not be taken as an indication of how well the retail/kickstarter version will perform.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><iframe loading="lazy" width="505" height="284" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/IiCuN1wsHgQ?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Via <a href="http://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2013/04/15/ouya-s-tech-is-a-generation-old.aspx">GameInformer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gamingbolt.com/ouya-is-a-generation-old-according-to-benchmarks/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150426</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
