<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>class action lawsuit &#8211; Video Game News, Reviews, Walkthroughs And Guides | GamingBolt</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gamingbolt.com/tag/class-action-lawsuit/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gamingbolt.com</link>
	<description>Get a Bolt of Gaming Now!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:40:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>New Xbox Live TOS comes with a mandatory binding arbitration clause</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/new-xbox-live-tos-comes-with-a-mandatory-binding-arbitration-clause</link>
					<comments>https://gamingbolt.com/new-xbox-live-tos-comes-with-a-mandatory-binding-arbitration-clause#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kartik Mudgal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 05:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tos]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=57684</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just like Sony, Microsoft has updated their TOS, which states that you cannot initate a class action lawsuit against them. Even EA did this with Origin a few months ago, when Battlefield 3 came out. So you know that these companies are desperate to protect their interests. You can check out the relevant portions in section 18 of the TOS. BINDING [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><a href="https://gamingbolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/xbox-live.png"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-18452" src="https://gamingbolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/xbox-live.png" alt="" width="505" height="282" srcset="https://gamingbolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/xbox-live.png 655w, https://gamingbolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/xbox-live-300x167.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 505px) 100vw, 505px" /></a></p>
<p>Just like Sony, Microsoft has updated their TOS, which states that you cannot initate a class action lawsuit against them. Even EA did this with Origin a few months ago, when Battlefield 3 came out. So you know that these companies are desperate to protect their interests.</p>
<p>You can check out the relevant portions in section 18 of the TOS.</p>
<p><strong>BINDING ARBITRATION</strong>.</p>
<p>IF YOU LIVE IN THE UNITED STATES, YOU AND MICROSOFT AGREE THAT IF YOU AND MICROSOFT DO NOT RESOLVE ANY DISPUTE BY INFORMAL NEGOTIATION UNDER SECTION 18.1.2 ABOVE, ANY EFFORT TO RESOLVE THE DISPUTE WILL BE CONDUCTED EXCLUSIVELY BY BINDING ARBITRATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ARBITRATION PROCEDURES IN SECTION 18.1.7 BELOW. YOU UNDERSTAND AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT BY AGREEING TO BINDING ARBITRATION, YOU ARE GIVING UP THE RIGHT TO LITIGATE (OR PARTICIPATE IN AS A PARTY OR CLASS MEMBER) ALL DISPUTES IN COURT BEFORE A JUDGE OR JURY. INSTEAD, YOU UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT ALL DISPUTES WILL BE RESOLVED BEFORE A NEUTRAL ARBITRATOR, WHOSE AWARD (DECISION) WILL BE BINDING AND FINAL, EXCEPT FOR A LIMITED RIGHT OF APPEAL UNDER THE FEDERAL ARBITRATION ACT. ANY COURT WITH JURISDICTION OVER THE PARTIES MAY ENFORCE THE ARBITRATOR&#8217;S AWARD.</p>
<p><em><strong>CLASS ACTION WAIVER.</strong> </em></p>
<p><em>YOU AND MICROSOFT AGREE THAT ANY PROCEED­INGS TO RESOLVE OR LITIGATE ANY DISPUTE, WHETHER IN ARBITRATION, IN COURT, OR OTHERWISE, WILL BE CONDUCTED SOLELY ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS, AND THAT NEITHER YOU NOR MICROSOFT WILL SEEK TO HAVE ANY DISPUTE HEARD AS A CLASS ACTION, A REPRESENTATIVE ACTION, A COLLECTIVE ACTION, A PRIVATE ATTORNEY-GENERAL ACTION, OR IN ANY PROCEEDING IN WHICH YOU OR MICROSOFT ACTS OR PROPOSES TO ACT IN A REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY. YOU AND MICROSOFT FURTHER AGREE THAT NO ARBITRATION OR PROCEEDING WILL BE JOINED, CONSOLIDATED, OR COMBINED WITH ANOTHER ARBITRATION OR PROCEEDING WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF YOU, MICROSOFT, AND ALL PARTIES TO ANY SUCH ARBITRATION OR PROECCEDING.</em></p>
<p><em></em>Read the rest of it <a href="http://www.xbox.com/en-US/legal/livetou">here</a>:</p>
<p>Tell us what you think in the comments section below.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gamingbolt.com/new-xbox-live-tos-comes-with-a-mandatory-binding-arbitration-clause/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">57684</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>EA Sued For Misleading PS3 Owners</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/ea-sued-for-misleading-ps3-owners</link>
					<comments>https://gamingbolt.com/ea-sued-for-misleading-ps3-owners#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kartik Mudgal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 06:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Battlefield 1943]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ps3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PSN]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=55633</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[EA is facing a class action lawsuit, Kotaku reports. EA had originally promised all PS3 copies to contain free download vouched for Battlefield 1943, but they backed out at the last minute. This has created some problems as they have been taken to court. They alleged that EA announced the news that the PS3 copies [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><a href="https://gamingbolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/battlefield-1943.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-16767" src="https://gamingbolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/battlefield-1943.jpg" alt="" width="505" srcset="https://gamingbolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/battlefield-1943.jpg 655w, https://gamingbolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/battlefield-1943-300x104.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 655px) 100vw, 655px" /></a></p>
<p>EA is facing a class action lawsuit, <a href="http://kotaku.com/5860729/ea-being-taken-to-court-over-broken-battlefield-promise">Kotaku</a> reports. EA had originally promised all PS3 copies to contain free download vouched for Battlefield 1943, but they backed out at the last minute. This has created some problems as they have been taken to court.</p>
<p>They alleged that EA announced the news that the PS3 copies won&#8217;t get Battlefield 1943 in a disrespectful manner. EA had announced it in <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/Battlefield/status/128867590423592961">Twitter</a>.</p>
<p>The suit said, &#8220;misled and profited from thousands of their customers by making a promise that they could not, and never intended, to keep&#8221;</p>
<p>They aren&#8217;t looking for money but just a free copy of Battlefield 1943. I&#8217;m actually surprised they didn&#8217;t demand for more. EA had made &#8216;Back to Karkand&#8217; DLC pack available early to PS3 owners in return of Battlefield 1943.</p>
<p>Tell us what you think in the comments section below.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gamingbolt.com/ea-sued-for-misleading-ps3-owners/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">55633</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
