<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RX 480 &#8211; Video Game News, Reviews, Walkthroughs And Guides | GamingBolt</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gamingbolt.com/tag/rx-480/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gamingbolt.com</link>
	<description>Get a Bolt of Gaming Now!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 19:41:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>AMD&#8217;s RX 480 Hard-Launches, Redefines $200 GPU Expectations</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/amds-rx-480-hard-launches-redefines-200-gpu-expectations</link>
					<comments>https://gamingbolt.com/amds-rx-480-hard-launches-redefines-200-gpu-expectations#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arjun Krishna Lal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 19:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX 480]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=270964</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You can actually buy one this time!]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-253550" src="https://gamingbolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/amd-polaris-5.jpeg" alt="amd polaris" width="620" height="338" /></strong></p>
<p>Finally. With Nvidia having played the Pascal card last month with the release of the GTX 1080, and subsequent outing of the GTX 1070, all eyes were on AMD, and Team Red&#8217;s first product based on the new Polaris architecture.</p>
<p>The RX 480 had a <em>lot </em>of expectations riding on it. With AMD having initially positioned the card as a new, mainstream entry-point for Virtual Reality experiences, performance in the GTX 970/980 range was expected. As reviews come in, we see that the RX 480 sticks closer to the GTX 970&#8217;s performance profile. But considering that the 4 GB model of the RX 480 costs a mere $200, we&#8217;re not complaining: this here is the <em>single fastest </em>mainstream $200 dollar part to reach the market. AMD&#8217;s not trying to snag the high-margin low-value market the way Nvidia is with the GTX 1070 and 1080.</p>
<p>Rather, hearkening back to the good old days of the HD 4870, AMD&#8217;s doubling down on the mainstream market, where it&#8217;s historically been at its most competitive. And although we&#8217;ve yet to hear of an actual dual-GPU RX 480 SKU, AMD&#8217;s positioning Crossfired 480s as a value-oriented alternative to the GTX 1080. Ah, just like ye good old days and the 4870X2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gamingbolt.com/amds-rx-480-hard-launches-redefines-200-gpu-expectations/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">270964</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>RX 480 Gaming Benchmarks Leak</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/rx-480-gaming-benchmarks-leak</link>
					<comments>https://gamingbolt.com/rx-480-gaming-benchmarks-leak#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arjun Krishna Lal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 19:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX 480]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=270259</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Coming soon to online retailers near you!]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://gamingbolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/amd-polaris-4.jpeg"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-253549" src="https://gamingbolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/amd-polaris-4.jpeg" alt="amd polaris" width="620" height="338" /></a></p>
<p>AMD&#8217;s RX 480, the hottest piece of PC hardware in the sub-$200 price bracket, has been getting an <em>awful </em>lot of hype. Leaks, benchmarks, even thermal readings have popped up over the internet days before the RX 480 embargo lifts, on June 29th.</p>
<p>Now we&#8217;ve got what are purportedly actual RX 480 gaming benchmarks (<a href="http://wccftech.com/amd-rx-480-gaming-benchmarks-leaked/" target="_blank">thanks WCCFTech</a>). This is important as, til now, we&#8217;ve only seen synthetic benchmark performance leaks: Firestrike performance doesn&#8217;t necessarily translate into real-world framerates.</p>
<p>The leaker uploaded benchmark videos of an RX 480 paired with an i5 6400 in <em>Doom, </em><em>The Witcher 3, Overwatch, Grand Theft Auto V, </em>and <em>Counterstrike: GO.</em> You can check out all the videos <a href="http://wccftech.com/amd-rx-480-gaming-benchmarks-leaked/" target="_blank">here<em>  </em></a>While it isn&#8217;t possible to verify whether the uploader was actually using an RX 480, the benchmark results fit in neatly with the circa-GTX 980 performance profile that we&#8217;ve come to expect of the RX 480 from earlier synthetic benchmarks. Per the leaked benchmarks, <em>Doom </em>runs at roughly 100 FPS at 1080p&#8211;interestingly, this falls in line with <a href="http://wccftech.com/amd-radeon-rx-480-graphics-card-doom-1440p-benchmark/" target="_blank">earlier reported picture</a> of the RX 480 powering a 144 Hz monitor. With this kind of power, high framerate gaming may well be within reach at mainstream pricepoints.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gamingbolt.com/rx-480-gaming-benchmarks-leak/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">270259</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
