<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Elder Scrolls 6 or Skyrim 2: It&#8217;s Not In Bethesda&#8217;s DNA To Release Yearly Sequels	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gamingbolt.com/the-elder-scrolls-6-or-skyrim-2-its-not-in-bethesdas-dna-to-release-yearly-sequels/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gamingbolt.com/the-elder-scrolls-6-or-skyrim-2-its-not-in-bethesdas-dna-to-release-yearly-sequels</link>
	<description>Get a Bolt of Gaming Now!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 14:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: urgelt		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/the-elder-scrolls-6-or-skyrim-2-its-not-in-bethesdas-dna-to-release-yearly-sequels#comment-272362</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[urgelt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=245069#comment-272362</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamingbolt.com/the-elder-scrolls-6-or-skyrim-2-its-not-in-bethesdas-dna-to-release-yearly-sequels#comment-272358&quot;&gt;Corvus Dove&lt;/a&gt;.

Agree.
Bethesda isn&#039;t just making games.  They&#039;re making gorgeous, fascinating sandboxes and handing to their customers a lot of control over what&#039;s in those sandboxes.  As most game studios are pulling back from handing over the keys to their gaming kingdoms to players, Bethesda is pushing forward with it, even to the point of letting *console users* add mods - whoever expected *that?*  A useful contrast is with EA/Bioware, which carefully meters everything the player experiences down to the gold piece and experience point and which has eliminated player modding.  Bethesda empowers the player.  EA/Bioware empowers itself; you play their way or not at all.
Obsidian did a fine job of walking in Bethesda&#039;s footprints with FONV, and some of the finest mods anywhere have been released for FONV (New Vegas Bounties I and II come to mind, among others).  I&#039;m hoping Bethesda will let Obsidian have a crack at making a FO game using the FO4 engine.  It&#039;s a very good fit; Obsidian has many early FO1 and FO2 developers on staff.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gamingbolt.com/the-elder-scrolls-6-or-skyrim-2-its-not-in-bethesdas-dna-to-release-yearly-sequels#comment-272358">Corvus Dove</a>.</p>
<p>Agree.<br />
Bethesda isn&#8217;t just making games.  They&#8217;re making gorgeous, fascinating sandboxes and handing to their customers a lot of control over what&#8217;s in those sandboxes.  As most game studios are pulling back from handing over the keys to their gaming kingdoms to players, Bethesda is pushing forward with it, even to the point of letting *console users* add mods &#8211; whoever expected *that?*  A useful contrast is with EA/Bioware, which carefully meters everything the player experiences down to the gold piece and experience point and which has eliminated player modding.  Bethesda empowers the player.  EA/Bioware empowers itself; you play their way or not at all.<br />
Obsidian did a fine job of walking in Bethesda&#8217;s footprints with FONV, and some of the finest mods anywhere have been released for FONV (New Vegas Bounties I and II come to mind, among others).  I&#8217;m hoping Bethesda will let Obsidian have a crack at making a FO game using the FO4 engine.  It&#8217;s a very good fit; Obsidian has many early FO1 and FO2 developers on staff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Evan Rogers		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/the-elder-scrolls-6-or-skyrim-2-its-not-in-bethesdas-dna-to-release-yearly-sequels#comment-272359</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Evan Rogers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 13:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=245069#comment-272359</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The firm bellieves many things.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The firm bellieves many things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Corvus Dove		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/the-elder-scrolls-6-or-skyrim-2-its-not-in-bethesdas-dna-to-release-yearly-sequels#comment-272358</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Corvus Dove]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 12:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=245069#comment-272358</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The lack of understanding begins with &quot;Skyrim 2&quot; being part of the headline.  Skyrim itself is not only the 5th in its series, but is IIRC the 8th in the TES franchise. 


In addition to it not being in Bethesda&#039;s DNA, its not in their games&#039; DNA.  Whereas most companies drum out 13 hours of fun for $60, Bethesda gives you hundreds of hours and still has new customers decades after original release (See: Morrowwind).   It&#039;s like comparing the works of Stephenie Meyer (Twilight) or R. L. Stine (Goosebumps) to Leo Tolstoy (War and Peace) or, more aptly for Fallout, Sun Tzu (The Art of War).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lack of understanding begins with &#8220;Skyrim 2&#8221; being part of the headline.  Skyrim itself is not only the 5th in its series, but is IIRC the 8th in the TES franchise. </p>
<p>In addition to it not being in Bethesda&#8217;s DNA, its not in their games&#8217; DNA.  Whereas most companies drum out 13 hours of fun for $60, Bethesda gives you hundreds of hours and still has new customers decades after original release (See: Morrowwind).   It&#8217;s like comparing the works of Stephenie Meyer (Twilight) or R. L. Stine (Goosebumps) to Leo Tolstoy (War and Peace) or, more aptly for Fallout, Sun Tzu (The Art of War).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JustMyThoughts		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/the-elder-scrolls-6-or-skyrim-2-its-not-in-bethesdas-dna-to-release-yearly-sequels#comment-272342</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JustMyThoughts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 04:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=245069#comment-272342</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Conservatively, the mod community has added hundreds of dollars worth of new content and replay value to the game over the years. How many of us have bought $60 games that we are so done playing with after just 6 months? Fallout series? You can play for years!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservatively, the mod community has added hundreds of dollars worth of new content and replay value to the game over the years. How many of us have bought $60 games that we are so done playing with after just 6 months? Fallout series? You can play for years!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bat Man		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/the-elder-scrolls-6-or-skyrim-2-its-not-in-bethesdas-dna-to-release-yearly-sequels#comment-272341</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bat Man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 04:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=245069#comment-272341</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think you have never played the fallout series you made several glaring mistakes that could only have been made by someone that has never played the previous games]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have never played the fallout series you made several glaring mistakes that could only have been made by someone that has never played the previous games</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Scrumptious Taint		</title>
		<link>https://gamingbolt.com/the-elder-scrolls-6-or-skyrim-2-its-not-in-bethesdas-dna-to-release-yearly-sequels#comment-272318</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scrumptious Taint]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2015 21:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamingbolt.com/?p=245069#comment-272318</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There is no need for yearly releases. The modding community is so vibrant, the games are always fresh.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no need for yearly releases. The modding community is so vibrant, the games are always fresh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
